Rhetoric in Digital Communication: Merging Tradition with Modernity

Authors

  • Anna Bendrat

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.29107/rr2019.3.8

Abstract

Looking into the definition of rhetoric in the digital space, one often encounters the view that rhetoric is too remote or too “ancient” to be used as a conceptual, theoretical or practical framework for researching digital media. However, a substantial body of contemporary media research applies the theory of rhetoric, using a modern conceptual apparatus (e.g. cognitive theories of metaphor). Based on Kenneth Burke’s model of the pentad, the article aims to show that media messages in the digital environment are based on the notion of the rhetorical situation and demonstrate that the rhetorical apparatus has a crucial role in discerning the ways to modify the discourse space in human-computer-human communication. The source of modification in the traditional model of a rhetorical situation is the interactive nature of communication in digital media and the fact that the recipient [agent a] is bestowed with the role of an active participant who can influence the content of the message. Thanks to the use of the rhetorical model of pentad, the argument goes that in contrast to traditional media, modifications in the model act 1 → agent → agency → act 2 are possible and they result from the inclusion of external participants [agent b] and changes in the ontological status of the digital medium from the role of an intermediary to an active participant in the communication process [agent c].

References

Aristotle. 1926. Rhetoric. Transl. J. H. Freese. Cambridge and London: Harvard University Press; William Heinemann Ltd.

Bitzer, Lloyd F. 1968. “The Rhetorical Situation.” Philosophy & Rhetoric 1 (1): 1–14. http://www.jstor.org/stable/40236733.

Bogost, Ian. 2007. Persuasive Games: The Expressive Power of Videogames. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Burke, Kenneth. 1969. A Grammar of Motives. Berkeley, Calif.: University of California Press.

Cadwalladr, Carole, and Emma Graham-Harrison. 2018. “Revealed: 50 Million Facebook Profiles Harvested for Cambridge Analytica in Major Data Breach.” The Guardian, March 17. https://www.theguardian.com/news/2018/mar/17/cambridge-analytica-facebook-influence-us-election.

Couldry, Nick. 2012. Media, Society, World: Social Theory and Digital Media Practice. Cambridge; Malden, MA: Polity.

Fadi, Salem, and Racha Mourtada. 2011. “Arab Social Media Report. Civil Movements: The Impact of Facebook and Twitter.” Dubai School of Government. http://unpan1.un.org/intradoc/groups/public/documents/dsg/unpan050860.pdf.

Kang, Cecilia. 2018. “Mark Zuckerberg Testimony: Senators Question Facebook’s Commitment to Privacy.” The New York Times, April 10, sec. U.S. https://www.nytimes.com/2018/04/10/us/politics/mark-zuckerberg-testimony.html.

Landow, George P. 1997. Hypertext: The Convergence of Contemporary Critical Theory and Technology. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press.

Lanham, Richard A. 2006. The Economics of Attention: Style and Substance in the Age of Information. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Lanham, Richard A. 1993. The Electronic Word: Democracy, Technology, and the Arts. Chicago: University Of Chicago Press.

Lieberman, Henry, Fabio Paternò, Markus Klann, and Volker Wulf. 2006. “End-User Development: An Emerging Paradigm.” In End User Development, Human-Computer Interaction Series, vol. 9, ed. Henry Lieberman, Fabio Paternò, and Volker Wulf, 1–8. Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands. doi: 10.1007/1-4020-5386-X_1.

Losh, Elizabeth. 2009. Virtualpolitik: An Electronic History of Government Media-Making in a Time of War. Cambridge, MA: MIT.

Manovich, Lev. 2002. The Language of New Media. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Murray, Janet H. 2011. Inventing the Medium: Principles of Interaction Design as a Cultural Practice by Murray Janet H. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.

Ong, Walter J. 1982. Orality and Literacy. London; New York: Routledge.

Overington, Michael A. 1977. “Kenneth Burke and the Method of Dramatism.” Theory and Society 4 (1): 131-156. doi: 10.1007/BF00209747.

Verhulsdonck, Gustav. 2013. “Digital Rhetoric and Globalization: A Convergence-Continuum Model.” In Digital Rhetoric and Global Literacies: Communication Modes and Digital Practices in the Networked World, ed. Gustav Verhulsdonck and Marohang Limbu, 1–40. Hershey, PA: IGI Global.

Winograd, Terry, and Fernando Flores. 1987. Understanding Computers and Cognition: A New Foundation for Design. Boston: Addison-Wesley Professional.

Wolf, Mark J. P., and Bernard Perron, eds. 2013. The Routledge Companion to Video Game Studies. New York, NY: Routledge.

Woodward, Bob, and Carl Bernstein. 1974. All the President’s Men. New York: Simon & Schuster.

Zappen, James P. 2005. “Digital Rhetoric: Toward an Integrated Theory.” Technical Communication Quarterly 14 (3): 319–25. doi: 10.1207/s15427625tcq1403_10.

Downloads

Published

2019-09-30

How to Cite

Bendrat, Anna. 2019. “Rhetoric in Digital Communication: Merging Tradition With Modernity”. Res Rhetorica 6 (3). https://doi.org/10.29107/rr2019.3.8.