Contemporary prolepsis in digital rhetoric: the roles and functions of proleptic cues

Authors

  • Alina Landowska SWPS Uniwersytet Humanistycznospołeczny
  • Andrea Rocci Università della Svizzera Italiana, Faculty of Communication, Culture and Society, Institute of Argumentation, Linguistics and Semiotics
  • Marcin Koszowy Warsaw University of Technology, Faculty of Administration and Social Science, Laboratory of The New Ethos

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.29107/rr2024.1.10

Keywords:

attracting attention, Gérard Genette, anticipatory rhetoric, digital rhetoric

Abstract

This article explores the adaptation of Gérard Genette's concept of narrative prolepsis in the realm of social media as the proleptic technique, demonstrating its effectiveness as a tool for anticipatory rhetoric in digital communication. By analysing selected instances from Twitter and Facebook, the study illustrates how digital utterances employ proleptic cues to capture audience attention and potentially engage audiences. The concept of prolepsis, traditionally associated with narrative foresight in literature, is shown to be effectively transposed into the digital context, where it functions as a mechanism to attract user attention. This adaptation highlights the dynamism of rhetorical strategies in the evolving landscape of digital communication, underscoring the continuity of classical rhetorical principles in new media environments. Future research should incorporate a corpus study, which would allow for an in-depth examination of the diverse array of proleptic cues employed by social media influencers. Furthermore, an exploration into the persuasive efficacy of prolepsis, along with its potential links to reasoning fallacies, could provide intriguing insights. Additionally, an analysis of audience reactions to these cues could contribute to a more holistic understanding of their impact.

Author Biographies

Andrea Rocci, Università della Svizzera Italiana, Faculty of Communication, Culture and Society, Institute of Argumentation, Linguistics and Semiotics

Andrea Rocci is Full full professor of Language Sciences and Director of the Institute of Argumentation, Linguistics and Semiotics at the Università della Svizzera italiana (Lugano). He is also Director of the Master programme in European Studies in Investor Relations and Financial Communication (ESIR) offered jointly with Università Cattolica (Milan). He has published extensively in the fields of argumentation, pragmatics, semantics and discourse analysis. He is co-author (with Marcel Danesi) of a textbook on Global linguistics. He has directed / is directing several projects on argumentation in the contexts of journalism, corporate communication and financial communication funded by the Swiss National Science Foundation (SNSF).

Marcin Koszowy, Warsaw University of Technology, Faculty of Administration and Social Science, Laboratory of The New Ethos

Marcin Koszowy is an associate professor and member of Laboratory of The New Ethos at the Warsaw University of Technology. He is a founding member of the steering board of ECA (European Conference on Argumentation), and chairs ArgDiaP organisation fostering research on argumentation in Poland. His work is situated in the areas of logic, philosophy of language, pragmatics, and AI. He has published 2 books and over 40 papers in journals such as ArgumentationPragmatics & Society, and Discourse & Society. Koszowy is currently a PI in a project An Argumentative Model of Rephrase co-run with the University of Fribourg.    

References

Anderson, Ben. 2010. “Preemption, Precaution, Preparedness: Anticipatory Action and Future Geographies’” Progress in Human Geography 34 (6): 777–98. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0309132510362600.

Bal, Mieke. 2009. Narratology. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.

Bamberg, Michael. 2011. ‘Who Am I? Narration and Its Contribution to Self and Identity’. Theory& Psychology 21 (1): 3–24. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/095935430935585.

Bauman, Zygmunt. 2000. Liquid Modernity. Cambridge: Polity Press.

Beck, Ulrich. 1996. “World Risk Society as Cosmopolitan Society?” Theory, Culture and Society13 (4): 1-32. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0263276496013004001.

Bendrat, Anna. 2019. “Rhetoric in Digital Communication: Merging Tradition with Modernity”. Res Rhetorica 6 (3): 111-124. DOI: https://doi.org/10.29107/rr2019.3.8.

Bridgeman, Teresa. 2005. ‘Thinking Ahead: A Cognitive Approach to Prolepsis’. Narrative 13 (2): 125–59.

Brooks, Peter. 1984. Reading for the Plot. Design and Intention in Narrative. New York: A.A. Knopf.

Business DIT. 2022. How Many Tweets per Day 2022. Accessed December 27, 2022. https://www.businessdit.com/number-of-tweets-per-day/.

Clauss, Patrick. 2007. “Prolepsis: Dealing with Multiple Viewpoints in Argument”. In Ontario Society of the Study of Argumentation Conference Archive. Ontario. https://scholar.uwindsor.ca/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1279&context=ossaarchive.

Currie, Mark. 2006. “Prolepsis”. In About Time: Narrative Fiction and the Philosophy of Time, ed. Mark Currie, 29–50. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press. 152

Dannenberg, Hilary. 2008. Coincidence and Counterfactuality. Plotting Time and Space in Narrative Fiction. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.

Datareportal. 2022. Facebook Statistics and Trends. Accessed December 27, 2022. https://datareportal.com/essential-facebook-stats.

Ede, Lisa, and Andrea Lunsford. 1987. ‘Audience Addressed / Audience Invoked: The Role of Audience in Composition Theory and Pedagogy’. In The Writing Teacher’s Sourcebook, ed. Edward Corbett, Nancy Myers, and Gary Tate, 320–34. New York: Oxford University Press.

Eyman, Douglas. 2015. Digital Rhetoric: Theory, Method, Practice. University of Michigan Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctv65swm2.

Facebook, 2022. Mark Zuckerberg. Accessed July 25, 2022. https://www.facebook.com/zuck/posts/10114316913387601.

Floridi, Luciano. 2014. The Fourth Revolution: How the Infosphere Is Reshaping Human Reality. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Genette, Gerard. 1980. Narrative Discourse. An Essay In Method. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.

Gilbert, Daniel T., and Timothy D. Wilson. 2007. “Prospection: Experiencing the Future”. Science 317 (5843): 1351–54. DOI: 10.1126/science.1144161.

Graffius, Scott M. 2022. “Lifespan (Half-Life) of Social Media Posts: Update for 2022.” Social Media Analytics Blog. December 28, 2022. https://www.scottgraffius.com/blog/files/social-2022.html.

Iser, Wolfgang. 1978. The Act of Reading. Baltimore: John Hopkins University.

Jong, Irene J.F. de. 2014. Narratology and Classics: A Practical Guide. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Kermode, Frank. 1967. The Sense of an Ending. New York: Oxford University Press.

Kind, Amy. 2020. “What Imagination Teaches”. In Becoming Someone New: Essays on Transformative Experience, Choice, and Change, ed. Enoch Lambert and John Schwenkler, 133–46. Oxford University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198823735.003.0008.

Lanham, Richard A. 1993. The Electronic Word: Democracy, Technology, and the Arts. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Levine, Robert. 2003. The Power of Persuasion: How We’re Bought and Sold. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.

Lieberman, Henry, Fabio Paternò, Markus Klann, and Volker Wulf. 2006. “End-User Development: An Emerging Paradigm”. In End User Development, ed. Henry Lieberman, Fabio Paternò, and Volker Wulf, 1–8. Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-5386-X_1.

Liveley, Genevieve. 2019. “Anticipation and Narratology”. In Handbook of Anticipation: Theoretical and Applied Aspects of the Use of Future in Decision Making, ed. Roberto Poli, 899–917. Cham: Springer International Publishing. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-91554-8_7.

Mar, Raymond A., and Keith Oatley. 2008. “The Function of Fiction Is the Abstraction and Simulation of Social Experience”. Perspectives on Psychological Science 3: 173–92. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-6924.2008.00073.x.

Mcluhan, Marshall. 1964. Understanding Media: The Extensions of Man. New York: McGraw-Hill.

Miller, Riel, Roberto Poli, and Pierre Rossel. 2018. “The Discipline of Anticipation. Foundations for Futures Literacy”. In Transforming the Future Anticipation in the 21st Century, ed. Riel Miller, 51–65. London: Routledge.

Morson, Gary Saul. 1994. Narrative and Freedom. New Haven: Yale University Press.

Oakley, Todd. 2011. “Attention and Rhetoric Prolepsis and the Problem of Meaning”. In The Rhetorical Emergence of Culture, ed. Christian Meyer and Felix Girke, 282–303. New York and Oxford: Berghahn Books.

Prince, Gerard. 1987. A Dictionary of Narratology. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.

Ratcliffe, John, and Luke Ratcliffe. 2015. ‘Anticipatory Leadership and Strategic Foresight: Five “Linked Literacies”’. Journal of Futures Studies 20 (1): 1–18.

Richardson, Brian. 2002. ‘Beyond Story and Discourse: Narrative Time in Postmodern and Nonmimetic Fiction’. In Narrative Dynamics. Essays on Time, Plot, Closure, and Frames, edited by Brian Richardson. Columbus: The Ohio State University Press.

Ryan, Marie-Laure. 1991. Possible Worlds, Artificial Intelligence and Narrative Theory. Bloomington: University of Indiana Press.

Savage, Anika, and Michael Sales. 2008. “The Anticipatory Leader: Futurist, Strategist and Integrator’. Strategy & Leadership 36 (6): 28–35. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/10878570810918331.

Garrett S. 1996. Hook, Spin, Buzz: How to Command, Attention, Change Minds & Influence People? Princeton, New Jersey: Petersons/Pacesetters Books.

Twitter. 2024. Venture Beat. Accessed January 31, 2024. https://twitter.com/VentureBeat/status/1746624500651655583

Twitter. 2023. Yuval Harari. Accessed January 31, 2024. https://twitter.com/harari_yuval/status/1721906561164169408

Twitter. 2023. Future Shift. Accessed January 31, 2024. https://twitter.com/futureshift/status/1732671357169586238

Twitter. 2022. AdBusters. Accessed January 31, 2024. https://twitter.com/Adbusters/status/1532101657743396864

Twitter. 2022. Amy Webb. Accessed August 3, 2022. https://twitter.com/amywebb/status/1579511325646258176

Twitter. 2022. Elon Musk. Accessed August 3, 2022. https://twitter.com/elonmusk/status/1483633282482847744

Twitter. 2022. Elon Musk. Accessed August 3, 2022. https://twitter.com/elonmusk/status/1552317587694010368

Twitter. 2022.Tim Hinchliffe. Accessed August 3, 2022. https://twitter.com/TimHinchliffe/status/1505988917882990597

Twitter. 2020. Bill Gates. Accessed July 25, 2022. https://twitter.com/BillGates/status/1255902245922709506?ref_src=twsrc%5Egoogle%7Ctw camp%5Eserp%7Ctwgr%5Etweet

Twitter. 2016. Hillary Clinton. Accessed January 31, 2024. https://twitter.com/HillaryClinton/status/791263939015376902

Twitter. 2014. Leonardo DiCaprio. Accessed August 3, 2022. https://twitter.com/leodicaprio/status/428733524544204801

Verhulsdonck, Gustav, and Marohang Limbu, eds. 2013. “Digital Rhetoric and Global Literacies: Communication Modes and Digital Practices in the Networked World”. Advances in Linguistics and Communication Studies (ALCS) Book Series. IGI Global.

Veszelszki, Ágnes. 2017. Digilect. The Impact of Infocommunication Technology on Language. Berlin, Boston: De Gruyter Saur.

Vettorello, Mattia, and James Burke. 2021. “Anticipatory Leadership: An Invitation To Be More Creative”. In Leadership for the Future: Lessons from the Past, Current Approaches, and Future Insights, ed. Thomas Mengel, 170–91. Newcastle, UK: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.

Visser, Jacky, Konat, Barbara, Duthie, Rory, Koszowy, Marcin, Budzynska, Katarzyna, and Reed, Chris. 2020. “Argumentation in the 2016 US Presidential Elections: Annotated corpora of television debates and social media reaction”. Language Resources and Evaluation, 54: 123–154.

Visser, Jacky, Lawrence, John, Reed, Chris, Wagemans, Jean, and Walton, Douglas (2021). Annotating Argument Schemes. Argumentation, 35: 101–139.154

Walton, D., Reed, C., & Macagno, F. 2008. Argumentation Schemes. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Welch, Kathleen E. 1999. Electric Rhetoric: Classical Rhetoric, Oralism and a New Literacy. Cambridge, Massachusetts: MIT Press.

Zappen, James P. 2005. “Digital Rhetoric: Toward an Integrated Theory”. Technical Communication Quarterly 14 (3): 319–25. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1207/s15427625tcq1403_10.

Zittoun, Tania, and Frédéric Cerchia. 2013. ‘Imagination as Expansion of Experience’. Integrative Psychological & Behavioral Science 47: 305–24. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12124-013-9234-2.

Downloads

Published

2024-03-28 — Updated on 2024-04-03

Versions

How to Cite

Landowska, Alina, Andrea Rocci, and Marcin Koszowy. (2024) 2024. “Contemporary Prolepsis in Digital Rhetoric: The Roles and Functions of Proleptic Cues”. Res Rhetorica 11 (1):138-54. https://doi.org/10.29107/rr2024.1.10.