Cinema and Environment: The Arts of Noticing in the Anthropocene
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.29107/rr2021.2.1Słowa kluczowe:
kino, afekt, estetyka, antropocen, nowy materializm, środowiskoAbstrakt
Celem niniejszego artykułu jest podjęcie refleksji na temat tego, w jaki sposób kino może pozwolić nam przemyśleć nasze relacje ze środowiskiem w kontekście antropocenu. W artykule nakreślono aktualne debaty na temat ekologii toczące się w obrębie humanistyki, ze szczególnym uwzględnieniem nowych materializmów, w celu wykazania, że film może być rozumiany jako „sztuka uważności” (Tsing 2015). Następnie omówiono wpływ teorii afektu na ekokrytykę i filmoznawstwo, po czym wskazano na możliwe kierunki w badaniach filmoznawczych z perspektywy afektywnej, nowomaterialistycznej i postantropocentrycznej. Podejścia te mogą być przydatne dla badań nad retoryką filmu, zwłaszcza dla rozważań nad „odwoływaniem się do emocji” (emotional appeals).
Bibliografia
Ahmed, Sara. 2006. “Orientations: Toward a Queer Phenomenology.” GLQ 12 (4): 543–74. https://doi.org/10.1215/10642684-2006-002.
Ahmed, Sara. 2010. The Promise of Happiness. Durham: Duke University Press.
Alaimo, Stacy. 2010. Bodily Natures: Science, Environment, and the Material Self. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
Alaimo, Stacy. 2016. Exposed: Environmental Politics and Pleasures in Posthuman Times. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
Anderson, Ben. 2009. “Affective Atmospheres.” Emotion, Space and Society 2 (2): 77–81. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.emospa.2009.08.005.
Barad, Karen. 2007. Meeting the Universe Halfway: Quantum Physics and the Entanglement of Matter and Meaning. Durham: Duke University Press.
Barker, Jennifer M. 2009. The Tactile Eye: Touch and the Cinematic Experience. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Bennett, Jane. 2010. Vibrant Matter: A Political Ecology of Things. Durham: Duke University Press.
Berger, John. 1980. “Why Look at Animals?” In About Looking, 3–28. London: Bloomsbury.
Berlant, Lauren. 2011. Cruel Optimism. Durham: Duke University Press.
Bladow, Kyle, and Jennifer Ladino. 2018. “Toward an Affective Ecocriticism: Placing Feeling in the Anthropocene.” In Affective Ecocriticism: Emotion, Embodiment, Environment, edited by Kyle Bladow and Jennifer Ladino, 1–22. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.
Blakesley, David. 2007. The Terministic Screen: Rhetorical Perspectives on Film. Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press.
Bowens, Max. 2018. “‘The Flesh of The Perceptible’: The New Materialism of Leviathan.” Film-Philosophy 22 (3): 428–47. https://doi.org/10.3366/film.2018.0088.
Braidotti, Rosi. 2006. Transpositions. Malden: Polity Press.
Braidotti, Rosi. 2013. The Posthuman. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Braidotti, Rosi. 2019. Posthuman Knowledge. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Brereton, Pat. 2005. Hollywood Utopia: Ecology in Contemporary American Cinema. Bristol and Portland: Intellect Books.
Brinkema, Eugenie. 2014. The Forms of the Affects. Durham and London: Duke University Press.
Bruno, Giuliana. 2002. Atlas of Emotion: Journeys in Art, Architecture, and Film. London: Verso.
Burke, Kenneth. 1966. Language as Symbolic Action: Essays on Life, Literature, and Method. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Butler, Judith. 2002. “Is Kinship Always Already Heterosexual?” Differences: A Journal of Feminist Cultural Studies, 13 (1): 14-44.
Butler, Judith. 2004. Undoing Gender. New York and London: Routledge.
Cahill, James Leo. 2013. “Anthropomorphism and Its Vicissitudes: Reflections on Homme-Sick Cinema.” In Screening Nature: Cinema beyond the Human, edited by Anat Pick and Guinevere Narraway, 73–90. New York and Oxford: Berghahn Books.
Carmichael, Deborah A. 2005. The Landscape of Hollywood Westerns: Ecocriticism in an American Film Genre. Salt Lake City: University of Utah Press.
Cavarero, Adriana. 2016. Inclinations: A Critique of Rectitude. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
Chakrabarty, Dipesh. 2009. “The Climate of History: Four Theses.” Critical Inquiry 35 (2): 197–222. https://doi.org/10.1086/596640.
Chavez, Mercedes. 2021. “Vernacular Landscapes.” Afterimage 48 (1): 37–53. https://doi.org/10.1525/aft.2021.48.1.37.
Clover, Carol J. 1992. Men Women and Chainsaws. Gender in the Modern Horror Film. London: BFI.
Conley, Verena Andermatt. 2016. “The Care of the Possible.” Cultural Politics 12 (3): 339–54. https://doi.org/10.1215/17432197-3648894.
Connolly, William E. 2013. The Fragility of Things: Self-Organizing Processes, Neoliberal Fantasies, and Democratic Activism. Durham: Duke University Press.
Coole, Diana, and Samantha Frost, eds. 2010. New Materialisms: Ontology, Agency, and Politics. Durham: Duke University Press.
Creed, Barbara. 1993. The Monstrous-Feminine: Film, Feminism, Psychoanalysis. London: Routledge.
Crutzen, Paul J., and Eugene F. Stoermer. 2000. “The ‘Anthropocene.’” Global Change Newsletter 41: 17–18.
Cubitt, Sean. 2019. “Ecocritique.” Media+Environment 1 (1). https://doi.org/10.1525/001c.10784.
De Luca, Tiago, and Nuno Barradas Jorge. 2016. Slow Cinema. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
Descola, Philippe. 2005. Par-delà nature et culture. Paris: Gallimard.
Fischer, Clara. 2016. “Feminist Philosophy, Pragmatism, and the ‘Turn to Affect’: A Genealogical Critique.” Hypatia 31 (4): 810–26. https://doi.org/10.1111/hypa.12296.
García Zarranz, Libe. 2020. “Feeling Sideways: Shani Mootoo and Kai Cheng Thom’s Sustainable Affects.” University of Toronto Quarterly 89 (1): 88–106. https://doi.org/10.3138/utq.89.1.06.
Gregg, Melissa, and Gregory J. Seigworth. 2010. The Affect Theory Reader. Durham and London: Duke University Press.
Guattari, Félix. 2000. The Three Ecologies. London and New Brunswick: Athlone Press.
Hansen, Mark B. 2015. Feed-Forward: On the Future of Twenty-First Century Media. Chicago: Chicago University Press.
Haraway, Donna. 2003. The Companion Species Manifesto: Dogs, People, and Significant Otherness. Chicago: Prickly Paradigm Press.
Haraway, Donna. 1991. Simians, Cyborgs, and Women: The Reinvention of Women. London and New York: Routledge.
Haraway, Donna. 2016. Staying with the Trouble: Making Kin in the Chthulucene. Durham: Duke University Press.
Hemmings, Clare. 2005. “Invoking Affect: Cultural Theory and the Ontological Turn.” Cultural Studies 19 (5): 548–67. https://doi.org/10.1080/09502380500365473.
Ingram, David. 2004. Green Screen: Environmentalism and Hollywood Cinema. Exeter: University of Exeter Press.
Iovino, Serenella, and Serpil Oppermann, eds. 2014. Material Ecocriticism. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
Ivakhiv, Adrian J. 2013. Ecologies of the Moving Image: Cinema, Affect, Nature. Waterloo, Ontario: Wilfrid Laurier University Press.
Kaplan, E. Ann. 2016. Climate Trauma: Foreseeing the Future in Dystopian Film and Fiction. New Brunswick, New Jersey: Rutgers University Press.
Kara, Selmin. 2016. “Anthropocenema: Cinema in the Age of Mass Extinctions.” In Post-Cinema. Theorizing 21st-Century Film, edited by Shane Denson and Julia Leyda, 750–84. Falmer: Reframe Books.
Kara, Selmin. 2020. “The Anthropocene Project and the Archiviolithic Imaginary.” Screen 61 (2): 315–21. https://doi.org/10.1093/screen/hjaa026.
Kolbert, Elizabeth. 2014. The Sixth Extinction: An Unnatural History. New York: Picador.
Landreville, John. 2019. “Alternative Ethics for Ecocinema: The Tree of Life and Post-Continuity Aesthetics.” New Review of Film and Television Studies 17 (1): 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1080/17400309.2019.1563365.
Lawrence, Michael. 2016. “Nature and the Non-Human in Andrea Arnold’s Wuthering Heights.” Journal of British Cinema and Television 13 (1): 177–94. https://doi.org/10.3366/jbctv.2016.0306.
Lefebvre, Martin. 2006. Landscape and Film. New York: Routledge.
Leikam, Susanne, and Julia Leyda. 2017. “Cli-Fi and American Studies: An Introduction.” Amerikastudien 62 (1): 109–120.
Love, Heather. 2007. Feeling Backward: Loss and the Politics of Queer History. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.
MacDonald, Scott. 2004. “Toward an Eco-Cinema.” Interdisciplinary Studies in Literature and Environment 11 (2): 107–32.
MacDonald, Scott. 2013. “The Ecocinema Experience.” In Ecocinema Theory and Practice, edited by Stephen Rust, Salma Monani, and Sean Cubitt, 17–42. New York: Routledge.
Marks, Laura. 2000. The Skin of the Film: Intercultural Cinema, Embodiment, and the Senses. Durham: Duke University Press.
Massumi, Brian. 2002. Parables for the Virtual: Movement, Affect, Sensation. Durham: Duke University Press.
McKim, Kristi. 2015. Cinema as Weather. London: Routledge.
McMahon, Laura. 2014. “Beyond the Human Body: Claire Denis’s Ecologies.” Alphaville 7. http://www.alphavillejournal.com/Issue7/HTML/Article%0AMcMahon.html.
McMahon, Laura. 2019. Animal Worlds: Film, Philosophy and Time. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
Moore, Jason. 2016. Anthropocene or Capitalocene?: Nature, History, and the Crisis of Capitalism. Oakland: PM Press.
Morton, Timothy. 2009. Ecology Without Nature: Rethinking Environmental Aesthetics. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Morton, Timothy. 2010. The Ecological Thought. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Mulvey, Laura. 1975. “Visual Pleasure and Narrative Cinema.” Screen 16: 6–18. https://doi.org/10.1093/screen/16.3.6.
Narine, Anil. 2018. Eco-Trauma Cinema. London: Routledge.
Neimanis, Astrida. 2017. Bodies of Water: Posthuman Feminist Phenomenology. London: Bloomsbury Academic.
Ngai, Sianne. 2005. Ugly Feelings. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Nixon, Rob. 2011. Slow Violence and the Environmentalism of the Poor. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.
O’Brien, Adam. 2016. Transactions with the World: Ecocriticism and the Environmental Sensibility of New Hollywood. New York: Berghahn Books.
Oppermann, Serpil. 2018. “The Scale of the Anthropocene: Material Ecocritical Reflections.” Mosaic 51 (3): 1–17.
Parikka, Jussi. 2014. The Anthrobscene. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
Paszkiewicz, Katarzyna. 2021. “Framing the Non-human: American Honey as Eco-Road Movie.” Journal of British Cinema and Television 18 (3): 303–328. https://doi.org/10.3366/jbctv.2021.0576.
Pedwell, Carolyn, and Anne Whitehead. 2012. “Affecting Feminism: Questions of Feeling in Feminist Theory.” Feminist Theory 13 (2): 115–29. https://doi.org/10.1177/1464700112442635.
Perez, Gilberto. 2019. The Eloquent Screen: A Rhetoric of Film. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
Pick, Anat. 2011. Creaturely Poetics: Animality and Vulnerability in Literature and Film. New York: Columbia University Press.
Plantinga, Carl. 2009. Moving Viewers: American Film and the Spectator’s Experience. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Plumwood, Val. 2002. Environmental Culture: The Ecological Crisis of Reason. London: Routledge.
Río, Elena del. 2008. Deleuze and the Cinemas of Performance: Powers of Affection. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
Rust, Stephen, and Salma Monani. 2013. “Introduction: Cuts to Dissolves – Defining and Situating Ecocinema Studies.” In Ecocinema Theory and Practice, edited by Stephen Rust, Salma Monani, and Sean Cubitt, 1–13. New York: Routledge.
Segarra, Marta. 2014. Teoría de los cuerpos agujereados. Santa Cruz de Tenerife: Melusina.
Segarra, Marta. 2021. Comunidades con acento. Barcelona: Icaria.
Seymour, Nicole. 2018. Bad Environmentalism: Irony and Irreverence in the Ecological Age. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
Shaviro, Steven. 1993. The Cinematic Body. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
Shaviro, Steven. 2010. Post-Cinematic Affect. O Books: Winchester.
Skiveren, Nicolai. 2020. “Spectral Toxicity: Atmospheres of Radiation in HBO’s Chernobyl and Svetlana Alexievich’s Voices of Chernobyl.” EKPHRASIS: The Anthropocene and Intermedial Ecocriticism, 72–96. https://doi.org/10.24193/ekphrasis.24.5.
Skiveren, Tobias. 2020. “Fictionality in New Materialism: (Re)Inventing Matter.” Theory, Culture and Society, 5–12. https://doi.org/10.1177/0263276420967408.
Sobchack, Vivian. 1992. The Address of the Eye: A Phenomenology of Film Experience. Princeton N.J.: Princeton University Press.
Sobchack, Vivian. 2004. Carnal Thoughts: Embodiment and Moving Image Culture. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Thrift, Nigel. 2008. Non-Representational Theory: Space, Politics, Affect. London: Routledge.
Tsing, Anna. 2015. The Mushroom at the End of the World: On the Possibility of Life in Capitalist Ruins. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Tsing, Anna L., Heather Swanson, Elaine Gan, and Nils Bubandt. 2017. Arts of Living on a Damaged Planet. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
Weik von Mossner, Alexa. 2012. “The Human Face of Global Warming: Varieties of Eco-Cosmopolitanism in Climate Change Documentaries.” Revista Canaria de Estudios Ingleses 64: 145–59.
Weik von Mossner, Alexa, ed. 2014. Moving Environments: Affect, Emotion, Ecology, and Film. Waterloo, Ontario: Wilfrid Laurier University Press.
Weik von Mossner, Alexa. 2017. Affective Ecologies: Empathy, Emotion, and Environmental Narrative. Columbus: The Ohio State University Press.
Weik von Mossner, Alexa. 2018. “Roland Emmerich’s The Day After Tomorrow.” In Cli-Fi: A Companion, edited by Axel Goodbody and Adeline Johns-Putra, 133–39. Berne and New York: Peter Lang.
Williams, Linda. 1991. “Film Bodies: Gender, Genre, and Excess.” Film Quarterly 44 (4): 2–13. https://doi.org/10.2307/1212758.
Williams, Raymond. 1977. Marxism and Literature. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Willoquet-Maricondi, Paula, ed. 2010. Framing the World: Explorations in Ecocriticism and Film. Charlottesville and London: University of Virginia Press.
Yusoff, Kathryn. 2018. A Billion Black Anthropocenes or None. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
Žižek, Slavoj. 2010. Living in the End Times. London and New York: Verso.
Pobrania
Opublikowane
Jak cytować
Numer
Dział
Licencja
Prawa autorskie (c) 2021 "Res Rhetorica"
Utwór dostępny jest na licencji Creative Commons Uznanie autorstwa 4.0 Międzynarodowe.
Artykuły publikowane są na lincencji CC BY 4.0. Treść licencji jest dostępna tutaj: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
Artykuły opublikowane na licencji CC-BY (wersje postprint) mogą być udostępniane przez autorów każdemu, na dowolnej platformie lub za pośrednictwem dowolnego kanału komunikacyjnego pod warunkiem, że zostały przypisane do Res Rhetorica jako pierwotnego wydawcy.
