Emotional appeal in ChatGPT prompts: A study of L2 speakers’ perceptions
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.29107/rr2024.4.9Słowa kluczowe:
ChatGPT, intersubiektywność, interakcja człowieka z komputerem, konwersacyjna sztuczna inteligencja, emotywne promptowanieAbstrakt
W artykule zbadano środki retoryczne stosowane przez studentów, dla których język angielski jest językiem obcym (English as a Foreign Language), w interakcjach z botem ChatGPT. W analizie wykazano, że większość uczestników badania nie postrzega tej interakcji jako typowej sytuacji komunikacyjnej i nie traktuje bota jako pełnoprawnego uczestnika komunikacji na równi z człowiekiem. Jednak zachęceni do stosowania w promptowaniu emotywnych środków retorycznych część studentów charakteryzowało taką interakcję z botem jako po części manipulacyjną i stwarzającą rodzaj dyskomfortu, co świadczy o różnicy w postrzeganiu komunikacji na linii człowiek-człowiek a człowiek-algorytm.
Pobrania
Bibliografia
Allan, Keith. 2013. “What is Common Ground?” In Perspectives on Linguistic Pragmatics. Perspectives in Pragmatics, Philosophy & Psychology, ed. Alessandro Capone, Franco Lo Piparo, and Marco Carapezza, 285–310. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-01014-4_11
Beneteau, Erin, et al. 2019. “Communication Breakdowns between Families and Alexa.” Proceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 1–13. https://doi. org/10.1145/3290605.330047
Bozkurt, Aras, and Ramesh C. Sharma. 2023. “Generative AI and Prompt Engineering: The Art of Whispering to Let the Genie out of the Algorithmic World.” Asian Journal of Distance Education 18(2): i–vii. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8174941
Cahn, Janet E, and Susan E. Brennan. 1999. “A Psychological Model of Grounding and Repair in Dialog.” In Proceedings of the AAAI Symposium on Psychological Models of Communication in Collaborative Systems. https://cdn.aaai.org/Symposia/Fall/1999/FS-99-03/FS99-03-004.pdf
Cain, William. 2024. “Prompting Change: Exploring Prompt Engineering in Large Language Model AI and Its Potential to Transform Education.” TechTrends 68(1): 47–57. https://link.springer.com/ article/10.1007/s11528-023-00896-0
Carston, Robyn. 2002. “Linguistic Meaning, Communicated Meaning and Cognitive Pragmatics.” Mind & Language 17(1–2): 127–148. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-0017.00192
Corti, Kevin, and Alex Gillespie. 2016. “Co-constructing Intersubjectivity with Artificial Conversational Agents: People Are More Likely to Initiate Repairs of Misunderstandings with Agents Represented as Human.” Computers in Human Behavior 58: 431–442. https://doi.org/ 10.1016/j.chb.2015.12.039
Dippold, Doris. 2023. “Can I Have the Scan on Tuesday? User Repair in Interaction with a Task- -oriented Chatbot and the Question of Communication Skills for AI.” Journal of Pragmatics 204: 21–32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2022.12.004
Evans, Vyvyan. 2016. “Design Features for Linguistically-Mediated Meaning Construction: The Relative Roles of the Linguistic and Conceptual Systems in Subserving the Ideational Function of Language”. Frontiers in Psychology 7: 156. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00156
Eyman, Douglas. 2015. Digital Rhetoric: Theory, Method, Practice. University of Michigan Press. https://www.jstor.org/stable/j.ctv65swm2
Guhan, Monika, and Suganthan Chandramohan. 2024. “A Study on Analyzing the Role of ChatGPT in English Acquisition among ESL Learners during English Language Classroom.” Language, 8(2). https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.28252.56961
Herring, Susan C. 2004. “Computer-mediated Discourse Analysis: An Approach to Researching Online Behavior.” In Designing for virtual communities in the service of learning, ed. Sasha A. Barab, Rob Kling, and James H. Gray, 338–376. New York: Cambridge University Press. http://ella.slis.indiana.edu/~herring/cmda.pdf
Hess, Aaron. 2017. “Introduction: Theorizing Digital Rhetoric.” In Theorizing Digital Rhetoric, ed. Aaron Hess and Amber Davisson, 1–16. Routledge.
Heston, Thomas F., and Charya Khun. 2023. “Prompt Engineering in Medical Education.” International Medical Education 2(3): 198–205. https://doi.org/10.3390/ime2030019
Holmes, Wayne, and Ilkka Tuomi. 2022. “State of the Art and Practice in AI in Education.” European Journal of Education 57(4): 542–570. https://doi.org/10.1111/ejed.12533
Holmes, Wayne. 2023. The Unintended Consequences of Artificial Intelligence and Education. Education International Research: Brussels, Belgium.
Hornberger, Marie, Arne Bewersdorff, and Claudia Nerdel. 2023. “What Do University Students Know about Artificial Intelligence? Development and Validation of an AI Literacy Test.” Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence 5: 100165. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2023.100165
Huang, Weijiao, Khe Foon Hew, and Luke K. Fryer. 2022. “Chatbots for Language Learning—Are They Really Useful? A Systematic Review of Chatbot supported Language Learning.” Journal of Computer Assisted Learning 38(1): 237–257. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12610
Kim, Jinhee. 2023. “Leading Teachers’ Perspective on Teacher-AI Collaboration in Education”. Education and Information Technologies 29(7): 8693–8724. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-023 -12109-5
Kohnke, Lucas, Benjamin Luke Moorhouse, and Di Zou. 2023. “ChatGPT for Language Teaching and Learning.” RELC Journal 54(2): 537–550. https://doi.org/10.1177/00336882231162868
Kong, Siu-Cheung, William Man-Yin Cheung, and Guo Zhang. 2021. “Evaluation of an Artificial Intelligence Literacy Course for University Students with Diverse Study Backgrounds.” Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence 2: 100026.
Kostka, Ilka, and Rachel Toncelli. 2023. “Exploring Applications of ChatGPT to English Language Teaching: Opportunities, Challenges, and Recommendations.” Tesl-Ej 27(3). https://doi.org/ 10.55593/ej.27107int
Krach, Sören, Frank Hegel, Britta Wrede, Gerhard Sagerer, Ferdinand Binkofski, and Tilo Kircher. 2008. “Can Machines Think? Interaction and Perspective Taking with Robots Investigated via fMRI.” PLoS ONE, 3(7): e2597. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0002597
Lawton Solutions. 2023. Improve ChatGPT Prompts with Priming. Accessed 30 June 2024. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Uz_DeqGhbjs
Leaver, Tama, and Suzanne Srdarov. 2023. “ChatGPT Isn't Magic: The Hype and Hypocrisy of Generative Artificial Intelligence (AI) Rhetoric.” M/C Journal 26(5). https://doi.org/10.5204/ mcj.3004
Langacker, Ronald W. 2008. Cognitive Grammar: A Basic Introduction. Oxford University Press.
Levinson Stephen C. 2022. “The Interaction Engine: Cuteness Selection and the Evolution of the Interactional Base for Language”. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological Sciences 377(1859): 20210108. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2021.0108
Li, Cheng, Jindong Wang, Yixuan Zhang, Kaijie Zhu, Wenxin Hou, Jianxun Lian, Fang Luo, Qiang Yang, and Xing Xie. 2023. “Large Language Models Understand and Can Be Enhanced by Emotional Stimuli.” arXiv:2307. https://arxiv.org/pdf/2307.11760
Lo, Leo S. 2023. “The CLEAR Path: A Framework for Enhancing Information Literacy through Prompt Engineering.” The Journal of Academic Librarianship 49(4): 102720. https://doi.org/10.1016/ j.acalib.2023.102720
Ma, Qing, Peter Crosthwaite, Daner Sun, and Di Zou. 2024. “Exploring ChatGPT Literacy in Language Education: A Global Perspective and Comprehensive Approach.” Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence 7: 100278.
Ng, Davy Tsz Kit, Jac Ka Lok Leung, Kai Wah Samuel Chu, and Maggie Shen Qiao. 2021. “AI Literacy: Definition, Teaching, Evaluation and Ethical Issues.” Proceedings of the Association for Information Science and Technology 58(1): 504-509.
Prompt Engineering. 2023. Emotional Prompting: The New Prompting Technique. Accessed 30 June 2024. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NcWQC4FokGU&t=138s&ab_channel=PromptEngineering
Reyman, Jessica. 2017. “The Rhetorical Agency of Algorithms.” In Theorizing Digital Rhetoric, ed. Aaron Hess and Amber Davisson, 112–125. Routledge.
Shevchenko, Iryna, Tamara Goncharova, and Volodymyr Gutorov. 2020. “Cognitive Pragmatics of American Presidential Debates: A Case for Economic Metaphors.” Cognition, Communication, Discourse 21: 36–49. https://doi.org/10.26565/2218-2926-2020-21-03
Tuomi, Ilkka, Romina Cachia, and Daniel Villar-Onrubia. 2023. “On the Futures of Technology in Education: Emerging Trends and Policy Implications.” Publications Office of the European Union 10: 079734. https://publications.jrc.ec.europa.eu/repository/handle/JRC134308
UNESCO. 2021. Recommendation on the Ethics of Artificial Intelligence. Accessed 30 June 2024. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000381137.locale=en
Pobrania
Opublikowane
Numer
Dział
Licencja
Prawa autorskie (c) 2024 Res Rhetorica
Utwór dostępny jest na licencji Creative Commons Uznanie autorstwa 4.0 Międzynarodowe.
Artykuły publikowane są na lincencji CC BY 4.0. Treść licencji jest dostępna tutaj: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
Artykuły opublikowane na licencji CC-BY (wersje postprint) mogą być udostępniane przez autorów każdemu, na dowolnej platformie lub za pośrednictwem dowolnego kanału komunikacyjnego pod warunkiem, że zostały przypisane do Res Rhetorica jako pierwotnego wydawcy.
