Emotional appeal in ChatGPT prompts: A study of L2 speakers’ perceptions

Autor

  • Iryna Morozova V.N. Karazin Kharkiv National University
  • Valeriia Nikolaienko V.N. Karazin Kharkiv National University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.29107/rr2024.4.9

Słowa kluczowe:

ChatGPT, intersubiektywność, interakcja człowieka z komputerem, konwersacyjna sztuczna inteligencja, emotywne promptowanie

Abstrakt

W artykule zbadano środki retoryczne stosowane przez studentów, dla których język angielski jest językiem obcym (English as a Foreign Language), w interakcjach z botem ChatGPT. W analizie wykazano, że większość uczestników badania nie postrzega tej interakcji jako typowej sytuacji komunikacyjnej i nie traktuje bota jako pełnoprawnego uczestnika komunikacji na równi z człowiekiem. Jednak zachęceni do stosowania w promptowaniu emotywnych środków retorycznych część studentów charakteryzowało taką interakcję z botem jako po części manipulacyjną i stwarzającą rodzaj dyskomfortu, co świadczy o różnicy w postrzeganiu komunikacji na linii człowiek-człowiek a człowiek-algorytm.

Pobrania

Statystyki pobrań niedostępne.

Biogramy autorów

  • Iryna Morozova - V.N. Karazin Kharkiv National University

    Acting Head and Associate Professor at the Department of English Philology and Foreign Language Teaching Methods of V.N. Karazin Kharkiv National University. PhD in Philology/Linguistics (2004). Her current research interests revolve around pragmatics and linguistic theories of politeness.

  • Valeriia Nikolaienko - V.N. Karazin Kharkiv National University

    Lecturer at the Department of English Philology and Foreign Language Teaching Methods of V.N. Karazin Kharkiv National University, and a PAUSE programme scholar hosted at Jean Moulin Lyon 3 University. PhD in Philology/Linguistics (2024). Her current research interests include stance, cognitive narratology, and cognitive pragmatics.

Bibliografia

Allan, Keith. 2013. “What is Common Ground?” In Perspectives on Linguistic Pragmatics. Perspectives in Pragmatics, Philosophy & Psychology, ed. Alessandro Capone, Franco Lo Piparo, and Marco Carapezza, 285–310. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-01014-4_11

Beneteau, Erin, et al. 2019. “Communication Breakdowns between Families and Alexa.” Proceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 1–13. https://doi. org/10.1145/3290605.330047

Bozkurt, Aras, and Ramesh C. Sharma. 2023. “Generative AI and Prompt Engineering: The Art of Whispering to Let the Genie out of the Algorithmic World.” Asian Journal of Distance Education 18(2): i–vii. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8174941

Cahn, Janet E, and Susan E. Brennan. 1999. “A Psychological Model of Grounding and Repair in Dialog.” In Proceedings of the AAAI Symposium on Psychological Models of Communication in Collaborative Systems. https://cdn.aaai.org/Symposia/Fall/1999/FS-99-03/FS99-03-004.pdf

Cain, William. 2024. “Prompting Change: Exploring Prompt Engineering in Large Language Model AI and Its Potential to Transform Education.” TechTrends 68(1): 47–57. https://link.springer.com/ article/10.1007/s11528-023-00896-0

Carston, Robyn. 2002. “Linguistic Meaning, Communicated Meaning and Cognitive Pragmatics.” Mind & Language 17(1–2): 127–148. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-0017.00192

Corti, Kevin, and Alex Gillespie. 2016. “Co-constructing Intersubjectivity with Artificial Conversational Agents: People Are More Likely to Initiate Repairs of Misunderstandings with Agents Represented as Human.” Computers in Human Behavior 58: 431–442. https://doi.org/ 10.1016/j.chb.2015.12.039

Dippold, Doris. 2023. “Can I Have the Scan on Tuesday? User Repair in Interaction with a Task- -oriented Chatbot and the Question of Communication Skills for AI.” Journal of Pragmatics 204: 21–32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2022.12.004

Evans, Vyvyan. 2016. “Design Features for Linguistically-Mediated Meaning Construction: The Relative Roles of the Linguistic and Conceptual Systems in Subserving the Ideational Function of Language”. Frontiers in Psychology 7: 156. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00156

Eyman, Douglas. 2015. Digital Rhetoric: Theory, Method, Practice. University of Michigan Press. https://www.jstor.org/stable/j.ctv65swm2

Guhan, Monika, and Suganthan Chandramohan. 2024. “A Study on Analyzing the Role of ChatGPT in English Acquisition among ESL Learners during English Language Classroom.” Language, 8(2). https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.28252.56961

Herring, Susan C. 2004. “Computer-mediated Discourse Analysis: An Approach to Researching Online Behavior.” In Designing for virtual communities in the service of learning, ed. Sasha A. Barab, Rob Kling, and James H. Gray, 338–376. New York: Cambridge University Press. http://ella.slis.indiana.edu/~herring/cmda.pdf

Hess, Aaron. 2017. “Introduction: Theorizing Digital Rhetoric.” In Theorizing Digital Rhetoric, ed. Aaron Hess and Amber Davisson, 1–16. Routledge.

Heston, Thomas F., and Charya Khun. 2023. “Prompt Engineering in Medical Education.” International Medical Education 2(3): 198–205. https://doi.org/10.3390/ime2030019

Holmes, Wayne, and Ilkka Tuomi. 2022. “State of the Art and Practice in AI in Education.” European Journal of Education 57(4): 542–570. https://doi.org/10.1111/ejed.12533

Holmes, Wayne. 2023. The Unintended Consequences of Artificial Intelligence and Education. Education International Research: Brussels, Belgium.

Hornberger, Marie, Arne Bewersdorff, and Claudia Nerdel. 2023. “What Do University Students Know about Artificial Intelligence? Development and Validation of an AI Literacy Test.” Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence 5: 100165. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2023.100165

Huang, Weijiao, Khe Foon Hew, and Luke K. Fryer. 2022. “Chatbots for Language Learning—Are They Really Useful? A Systematic Review of Chatbot supported Language Learning.” Journal of Computer Assisted Learning 38(1): 237–257. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12610

Kim, Jinhee. 2023. “Leading Teachers’ Perspective on Teacher-AI Collaboration in Education”. Education and Information Technologies 29(7): 8693–8724. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-023 -12109-5

Kohnke, Lucas, Benjamin Luke Moorhouse, and Di Zou. 2023. “ChatGPT for Language Teaching and Learning.” RELC Journal 54(2): 537–550. https://doi.org/10.1177/00336882231162868

Kong, Siu-Cheung, William Man-Yin Cheung, and Guo Zhang. 2021. “Evaluation of an Artificial Intelligence Literacy Course for University Students with Diverse Study Backgrounds.” Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence 2: 100026.

Kostka, Ilka, and Rachel Toncelli. 2023. “Exploring Applications of ChatGPT to English Language Teaching: Opportunities, Challenges, and Recommendations.” Tesl-Ej 27(3). https://doi.org/ 10.55593/ej.27107int

Krach, Sören, Frank Hegel, Britta Wrede, Gerhard Sagerer, Ferdinand Binkofski, and Tilo Kircher. 2008. “Can Machines Think? Interaction and Perspective Taking with Robots Investigated via fMRI.” PLoS ONE, 3(7): e2597. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0002597

Lawton Solutions. 2023. Improve ChatGPT Prompts with Priming. Accessed 30 June 2024. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Uz_DeqGhbjs

Leaver, Tama, and Suzanne Srdarov. 2023. “ChatGPT Isn't Magic: The Hype and Hypocrisy of Generative Artificial Intelligence (AI) Rhetoric.” M/C Journal 26(5). https://doi.org/10.5204/ mcj.3004

Langacker, Ronald W. 2008. Cognitive Grammar: A Basic Introduction. Oxford University Press.

Levinson Stephen C. 2022. “The Interaction Engine: Cuteness Selection and the Evolution of the Interactional Base for Language”. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological Sciences 377(1859): 20210108. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2021.0108

Li, Cheng, Jindong Wang, Yixuan Zhang, Kaijie Zhu, Wenxin Hou, Jianxun Lian, Fang Luo, Qiang Yang, and Xing Xie. 2023. “Large Language Models Understand and Can Be Enhanced by Emotional Stimuli.” arXiv:2307. https://arxiv.org/pdf/2307.11760

Lo, Leo S. 2023. “The CLEAR Path: A Framework for Enhancing Information Literacy through Prompt Engineering.” The Journal of Academic Librarianship 49(4): 102720. https://doi.org/10.1016/ j.acalib.2023.102720

Ma, Qing, Peter Crosthwaite, Daner Sun, and Di Zou. 2024. “Exploring ChatGPT Literacy in Language Education: A Global Perspective and Comprehensive Approach.” Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence 7: 100278.

Ng, Davy Tsz Kit, Jac Ka Lok Leung, Kai Wah Samuel Chu, and Maggie Shen Qiao. 2021. “AI Literacy: Definition, Teaching, Evaluation and Ethical Issues.” Proceedings of the Association for Information Science and Technology 58(1): 504-509.

Prompt Engineering. 2023. Emotional Prompting: The New Prompting Technique. Accessed 30 June 2024. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NcWQC4FokGU&t=138s&ab_channel=PromptEngineering

Reyman, Jessica. 2017. “The Rhetorical Agency of Algorithms.” In Theorizing Digital Rhetoric, ed. Aaron Hess and Amber Davisson, 112–125. Routledge.

Shevchenko, Iryna, Tamara Goncharova, and Volodymyr Gutorov. 2020. “Cognitive Pragmatics of American Presidential Debates: A Case for Economic Metaphors.” Cognition, Communication, Discourse 21: 36–49. https://doi.org/10.26565/2218-2926-2020-21-03

Tuomi, Ilkka, Romina Cachia, and Daniel Villar-Onrubia. 2023. “On the Futures of Technology in Education: Emerging Trends and Policy Implications.” Publications Office of the European Union 10: 079734. https://publications.jrc.ec.europa.eu/repository/handle/JRC134308

UNESCO. 2021. Recommendation on the Ethics of Artificial Intelligence. Accessed 30 June 2024. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000381137.locale=en

Opublikowane

31-12-2024

Jak cytować

Morozova, Iryna, and Valeriia Nikolaienko. 2024. “Emotional Appeal in ChatGPT Prompts: A Study of L2 speakers’ Perceptions”. Res Rhetorica 11 (4): 155-74. https://doi.org/10.29107/rr2024.4.9.