The doxastic body: Embodying ideological orientations
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.29107/rr2024.2.1Słowa kluczowe:
ciało doksastyczne, ideologia, badania terenowe, ucieleśnienie, wygłoszenieAbstrakt
Choć ciało podlega dogłębnej analizie w studiach retorycznych, rozumiane jest przede wszystkim jako tekst lub poprzez tekst. Po dokonaniu przeglądu literatury na temat ciała w badaniach retorycznych, niniejszy artykuł dowodzi, że umiejscowione, konkretne ciało jest integralną częścią tożsamości ideologicznej poprzez swoją funkcję doksastycznego dowodu w argumentacji entymematycznej. Artykuł nakreśla retoryczno-etnograficzną perspektywę w badaniu punktów ekspresji doksastycznego ciała w konkretnej dziedzinie.
Pobrania
Bibliografia
Ahmed, Sara. 2006. Queer Phenomenology: Orientations, Objects, Others. Durham: Duke University Press.
Ahmed, Sara. 2010. The Cultural Politics of Emotion. Reprinted. Edinburgh: Edinburgh Univ. Press.
Ahmed, Sara. 2017. Living a Feminist Life. Durham: Duke University Press. https://doi.org/10.1515/9780822373377.
Althusser, Louis. 2001. “Ideology and Ideological State Apparatuses (Notes towards an Investigation).” In Lenin and Philosophy, and Other Essays, 85–126. New York: Monthly Review Press.
Bedsole, Nathan Henry. 2018. “Voice as Little Object (a)Rgument: On Hearing Gore Vidal and William F. Buckley Jr.” Argumentation and Advocacy 54 (4): 323–39. https://doi.org/10.1080/10511431.2018.1509594.
Black, Edwin. 1970. “The Second Persona.” The Quarterly Journal of Speech 56 (2): 109–19. https://doi.org/10.1080/00335637009382992.
Burke, Kenneth. 1966. “Terministic Screens.” In Language As Symbolic Action, 1st ed., 44–62. Essays on Life, Literature, and Method. University of California Press. https://doi.org/10.2307/jj.2711556.6.
Burke, Kenneth. 1973. “Literature as Equipment for Living.” In The Philosophy of Literary Form, 293–304. University of California Press. https://doi.org/10.1525/9780520340978-010.
Burke, Kenneth. 1978. “(Nonsymbolic) Motion/(Symbolic) Action.” Critical Inquiry 4 (4): 809–38. https://doi.org/10.1086/447966.
Butler, Judith. 2006. Gender Trouble: Feminism and the Subversion of Identity. [10th anniversary ed.]. Routledge Classics. Oxford: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203824979.
Butler, Judith, Maggie Doherty, Ajay Singh Chaudhary, Gabriel Winant, and Kevin Lozano. 2021. “‘What Would It Mean to Think That Thought?’: The Era of Lauren Berlant,” July 8, 2021. https://www.thenation.com/article/culture/lauren-berlant-obituary/.
Butterworth, Michael L. 2008. “‘Katie Was Not Only a Girl, She Was Terrible’: Katie Hnida, Body Rhetoric, and Football at the University of Colorado.” Communication Studies 59 (3): 259–73. https://doi.org/10.1080/10510970802257705.
Chaput, Catherine. 2010. “Rhetorical Circulation in Late Capitalism: Neoliberalism and the Overdetermination of Affective Energy.” Philosophy & Rhetoric 43 (1): 1–25. https://doi.org/10.1353/par.0.0047.
Charland, Maurice. 1987. “Constitutive Rhetoric: The Case of the Peuple Québécois.” Quarterly Journal of Speech 73 (2): 133–50. https://doi.org/10.1080/00335638709383799.
Chávez, Karma R. 2009. “Embodied Translation: Dominant Discourse and Communication with Migrant Bodies-as-Text.” The Howard Journal of Communications 20 (1): 18–36. https://doi.org/10.1080/10646170802664912.
Chávez, Karma R. 2018. “The Body: An Abstract and Actual Rhetorical Concept.” Rhetoric Society Quarterly 48 (3): 242–50. https://doi.org/10.1080/02773945.2018.1454182.
Chevrette, Roberta, and Aaron Hess. 2019. “‘The FEMEN Body Can Do Everything’: Generating the Agentic Bodies of Social Movement through Internal and External Rhetorics.” Communication Monographs 86 (4): 416–37. https://doi.org/10.1080/03637751.2019.1595078.
Cloud, Dana L., and Joshua Gunn. 2011. “Introduction: W(h)Ither Ideology?” Western Journal of Communication 75 (4): 407–20. https://doi.org/10.1080/10570314.2011.588897.
Crowley, Sharon. 1999. “Afterword. The Material of Rhetoric.” In Rhetorical Bodies, edited by Jack Selzer and Sharon Crowley, 357–64. Madison, Wis: University of Wisconsin Press.
DeLuca, Kevin Michael. 1999. “Unruly Arguments: The Body Rhetoric of Earth First!, Act Up, and Queer Nation.” Argumentation and Advocacy 36 (1): 9–21. https://doi.org/10.1080/00028533.1999.11951634.
Dickinson, Greg, and Giorgia Aiello. 2016. “Being Through There Matters: Materiality, Bodies, and Movement in Urban Communication Research.” International Journal of Communication (19328036) 10 (January):1294–1308.
Dickinson, Greg, Brian L. Ott, and Eric Aoki. 2019. “Spaces of Remembering and Forgetting. The Reverent Eye/I at the Plains Indian Museum.” In Readings in Rhetorical Fieldwork, edited by Samantha Senda-Cook, Aaron Hess, Michael Middleton, and Danielle Endres, 133–49. New York: Routledge/Taylor & Francis Group.
Druschke, Caroline Gottschalk. 2019. “A Trophic Future for Rhetorical Ecologies.” Enculturation, February. https://enculturation.net/a-trophic-future.
Edbauer [Rice], Jenny. 2004. “Executive Overspill: Affective Bodies, Intensity, and Bush-in-Relation.” Postmodern Culture 15 (1): 0–0. https://doi.org/10.1353/pmc.2004.0037.
Edbauer [Rice], Jenny. 2005. “Unframing Models of Public Distribution: From Rhetorical Situation to Rhetorical Ecologies.” Rhetoric Society Quarterly 35 (4): 5–24. https://doi.org/10.1080/02773940509391320.
Ehrenfeld, Dan. 2020. “‘Sharing a World with Others’: Rhetoric’s Ecological Turn and the Transformation of the Networked Public Sphere.” Rhetoric Society Quarterly 50 (5): 305–20. https://doi.org/10.1080/02773945.2020.1813321.
Fisker, Thore Keitum. 2022. “Constitutive actio. Voice use and body language in rhetorical processes of identification.” Rhetorica Scandinavica, no. 84 (November), 60–75. https://doi.org/10.52610/KGTK9487.
Foucault, Michel. 1982. Discipline and Punish: The Birth of the Prison. Translated by Allan Sheridan. Repr. Peregrine Books. Harmondsworth: Penguin Books.
Foucault, Michel. 1990. The History of Sexuality. Reprint. London: Penguin Books.
Foucault, Michel. 2021. “Nietzsche, Genealogy, History.” In Language, Counter-Memory, Practice, translated by Donald F. Bouchard, 139–64. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press. https://doi.org/10.1515/9781501741913-008.
Fredal, James. 2018. “Is the Enthymeme a Syllogism?” Philosophy & Rhetoric 51 (1): 24–49. https://doi.org/10.5325/philrhet.51.1.0024.
Fuchs, Thomas. 2022. Ecology of the Brain: The Phenomenology and Biology of the Embodied Mind. First edition. Oxford, United Kingdom: Oxford University Press.
Gelang, Marie. 2021. “Kairos and Actio – a Rhetorical Approach to Timing.” Res Rhetorica 8 (3): 111–24. https://doi.org/10.29107/rr2021.3.6.
Gelang, Marie, and Waldemar Petermann. 2017. “Actio as Embodied Attitudes: A Burkean, Multimodal Approach to the Study of Nonverbal Communication.” Rhetorica Scandinavica, 75: 7–26. https://doi.org/10.52610/rhs.v26i84.81.
Gruber, David R. 2014. “The (Digital) Majesty of All Under Heaven: Affective Constitutive Rhetoric at the Hong Kong Museum of History’s Multi-Media Exhibition of Terracotta Warriors.” Rhetoric Society Quarterly 44 (2): 148–67. https://doi.org/10.1080/02773945.2014.888462.
Guattari, Félix. 2014. The Three Ecologies. Bloomsbury Revelations. London ; New York: Bloomsbury Academic.
Gunn, Joshua. 2010. “On Speech and Public Release.” Rhetoric & Public Affairs 13 (2): 175–215. https://doi.org/10.1353/rap.0.0146.
Gunn, Joshua, and Dana L. Cloud. 2010. “Agentic Orientation as Magical Voluntarism.” Communication Theory 20 (1): 50–78. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2885.2009.01349.x.
Happe, Kelly E. 2013. “The Body of Race: Toward a Rhetorical Understanding of Racial Ideology.” The Quarterly Journal of Speech 99 (2): 131–55. https://doi.org/10.1080/00335630.2013.775700.
Hariman, Robert. 1986. “Status, Marginality, and Rhetorical Theory.” The Quarterly Journal of Speech 72 (1): 38–54. https://doi.org/10.1080/00335638609383757.
Hawhee, Debra. 2004. Bodily Arts: Rhetoric and Athletics in Ancient Greece. 1st ed, 1. Austin: University of Texas Press. https://doi.org/10.7560/705845.
Hawhee, Debra. 2009. Moving Bodies: Kenneth Burke at the Edges of Language. Studies in Rhetoric/Communication. Columbia, S.C: University of South Carolina Press.
Hoff-Clausen, Elisabeth. 2022. “Existential Crisis Rhetoric – Setting an Example of Embodied Trust in a Sermon Preached during the Pandemic.” Rhetorica Scandinavica 26 (84): 76–93. https://doi.org/10.52610/rhs.v26i84.81.
Johnson, E. Patrick. 2001. “‘Quare’ Studies, or (Almost) Everything I Know about Queer Studies I Learned from My Grandmother.” Text and Performance Quarterly 21 (1): 1–25. https://doi.org/10.1080/10462930128119.
Johnstone, Christopher Lyle. 2001. “Communicating in Classical Contexts: The Centrality of Delivery.” Quarterly Journal of Speech 87 (2): 121–43. https://doi.org/10.1080/00335630109384325.
Kiewe, Amos. 1999. “The Body as Proof: Franklin D. Roosevelt’s Preparations for the 1932 Presidential Campaign.” Argumentation and Advocacy 36 (2): 88–100. https://doi.org/10.1080/00028533.1999.11951640.
Kišiček, Gabrijela. 2018. “Persuasive Power of Prosodic Features.” Argumentation and Advocacy 54 (4): 345–50. https://doi.org/10.1080/10511431.2019.1525003.
Laban, Rudolf. 1975. Laban’s Principles of Dance and Movement Notation. Edited by Roderyk Lange. 2. ed. / annotated and ed. By Roderyk Lange. London: Macdonald & Evans.
Laban, Rudolf. 2011. The Mastery of Movement. Edited by Lisa Ullmann. 4. ed., rev.enl. / By Lisa Ullmann. Alton: Dance Books.
Landau, Jamie. 2016. “Feeling Rhetorical Critics: Another Affective-Emotional Field Method for Rhetorical Studies.” In Text + Field: Innovations in Rhetorical Method, edited by Sara L. McKinnon, Robert Asen, Karma R. Chávez, and Robert Glenn Howard, 72–85. University Park, Pennsylvania: The Pennsylvania State University Press.
Landau, Jamie, and Bethany Keeley-Jonker. 2018. “Conductor of Public Feelings: An Affective-Emotional Rhetorical Analysis of Obama’s National Eulogy in Tucson.” The Quarterly Journal of Speech 104 (2): 166–88. https://doi.org/10.1080/00335630.2018.1447138.
LeMesurier, Jennifer Lin. 2014. “Somatic Metaphors: Embodied Recognition of Rhetorical Opportunities.” Rhetoric Review 33 (4): 362–80. https://doi.org/10.1080/07350198.2014.946868.
LeMesurier, Jennifer Lin. 2022. “Race as Supplement: Surfaces and Crevices of the Asian Feminine Body.” The Quarterly Journal of Speech 108 (3): 251–70. https://doi.org/10.1080/00335630.2022.2088841.
Lloyd, Keith. 2013. “Reinterpreting Enthymemes to Include the Nonverbal.” JAC : A Journal of Composition Theory 33 (3/4): 732–49.
Lundberg, Christian, and Joshua Gunn. 2005. “‘Ouija Board, Are There Any Communications?’ Agency, Ontotheology, and the Death of the Humanist Subject, or, Continuing the ARS Conversation.” Rhetoric Society Quarterly 35 (4): 83–105. https://doi.org/10.1080/02773940509391323.
McGee, Michael C. 1980. “The ‘Ideograph’: A Link between Rhetoric and Ideology.” The Quarterly Journal of Speech 66 (1): 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1080/00335638009383499.
McKerrow, Raymie E. 1998. “Corporeality and Cultural Rhetoric: A Site for Rhetoric’s Future.” Southern Communication Journal 63 (4): 315–28. https://doi.org/10.1080/10417949809373105.
McKinnon, Sara L., Robert Asen, Karma R. Chávez, and Robert Glenn Howard. 2016a. “Introduction: Articulating Text and Field in the Nodes of Rhetorical Scholarship.” In Text + Field: Innovations in Rhetorical Method, edited by Sara L. McKinnon, Robert Asen, Karma R. Chávez, and Robert Glenn Howard, 1–21. University Park, Pennsylvania: The Pennsylvania State University Press.
McKinnon, Sara L., Robert Asen, Karma R. Chávez, and Robert Glenn Howard, eds. 2016b. Text + Field: Innovations in Rhetorical Method. University Park, Pennsylvania: The Pennsylvania State University Press.
Middleton, Michael K., Aron Hess, Danielle Endres, and Samantha Senda-Cook. 2015. Participatory Critical Rhetoric: Theoretical and Methodological Foundations for Studying Rhetoric in Situ. Lanham, Maryland: Lexington Books.
Middleton, Michael K., Samantha Senda-Cook, and Danielle Endres. 2011. “Articulating Rhetorical Field Methods: Challenges and Tensions.” Western Journal of Communication 75 (4): 386–406. https://doi.org/10.1080/10570314.2011.586969.
Newman, Sara. 2009. “Gestural Enthymemes: Delivering Movement in 18th- and 19th-Century Medical Images.” Written Communication 26 (3): 273–94. https://doi.org/10.1177/0741088309335404.
Ott, Brian L., and Greg Dickinson. 2019. “Redefining Rhetoric: Why Matter Matters.” Berlin Journal of Critical Theory, January. https://www.academia.edu/38244148/Redefining_Rhetoric_Why_Matter_Matters.
Prenosil, Joshua D. 2012. “The Embodied Enthymeme: A Hybrid Theory of Protest.” JAC : A Journal of Composition Theory 32 (1/2): 279–303.
Rand, Erin J. 2014. “‘What One Voice Can Do’: Civic Pedagogy and Choric Collectivity at Camp Courage.” Text and Performance Quarterly 34 (1): 28–51. https://doi.org/10.1080/10462937.2013.853825.
Rickert, Thomas. 2013. Ambient Rhetoric: The Attunements of Rhetorical Being. Pittsburgh Series in Composition, Literacy, and Culture. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctt5hjqwx.
Schmitz, Hermann, Rudolf O. Müllan, and Jan Slaby. 2011. “Emotions Outside the Box—the New Phenomenology of Feeling and Corporeality.” Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences 10 (2): 241–59. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11097-011-9195-1.
Slaby, Jan. 2020. “Atmospheres – Schmitz, Massumi and Beyond.” In Music As Atmosphere, 1st ed., 274–85. United Kingdom: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780815358718-16.
Thimsen, A. Freya. 2015. “The People Against Corporate Personhood: Doxa and Dissensual Democracy.” The Quarterly Journal of Speech 101 (3): 485–508. https://doi.org/10.1080/00335630.2015.1055785.
Wander, Philip. 1983. “The Ideological Turn in Modern Criticism.” In Readings in Rhetorical Criticism, edited by Carl R. Burgchardt, 4., 77–96. State College, Pa: Strata Pub.
Wander, Philip. 1984. “The Third Persona: An Ideological Turn in Rhetorical Theory.” Central States Speech Journal 35 (4): 197–216. https://doi.org/10.1080/10510978409368190.
Wells, Susan. 1999. “Legible Bodies: Nineteenth-Century Women Physicians and the Rhetoric of Dissection.” In Rhetorical Bodies, edited by Jack Selzer and Sharon Crowley, 58–74. Madison, Wis: University of Wisconsin Press.
Pobrania
Opublikowane
Wersje
- 01-07-2024 - (3)
- 01-07-2024 - (2)
- 30-06-2024 - (1)
Numer
Dział
Licencja
Prawa autorskie (c) 2024 Res Rhetorica
Utwór dostępny jest na licencji Creative Commons Uznanie autorstwa 4.0 Międzynarodowe.
Artykuły publikowane są na lincencji CC BY 4.0. Treść licencji jest dostępna tutaj: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
Artykuły opublikowane na licencji CC-BY (wersje postprint) mogą być udostępniane przez autorów każdemu, na dowolnej platformie lub za pośrednictwem dowolnego kanału komunikacyjnego pod warunkiem, że zostały przypisane do Res Rhetorica jako pierwotnego wydawcy.
