Toxic affirmation: The Nordic Waste scandal and the political pitfalls of affirmative materialisms in rhetorical criticism
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.29107/rr2024.2.3Słowa kluczowe:
tosyczna afirmacja, nowa retoryka materialistyczna, dualizm umysł-ciało, Nordic Waste, krytyka retorycznaAbstrakt
W ostatnich latach badacze retoryki zwrócili się ku badaniu materialności retoryki, a także retoryczności materii, często wprowadzając posthumanistyczne lub antyantropocentryczne stanowisko odrzucające dualizm (dualizmy) umysł-ciało, a także zwracając się ku ramom afirmatywnym jako alternatywie dla krytyki. Przedstawiając skandal Nordic Waste w Danii w 2023 r., w artykule wskazano na ryzyko toksycznego powielania perspektyw promowanych przez korporacje szkodzące środowisku w obrębie retoryki skupiającej się na materialności i afirmacji.
Pobrania
Bibliografia
Ahmed, Sara. 2010a. “Happy Objects.” In The Affect Theory Reader, edited by Melissa Gregg and Gregory J. Seigworth, 29–51. Durham: Duke University Press.
Ahmed, Sara. 2010b. The Promise of Happiness. Durham [NC]: Duke University Press.
Barnett, Joshua Trey. 2021. “Rhetoric for Earthly Coexistence: Imagining an Ecocentric Rhetoric.” Rhetoric and Public Affairs 24 (1–2): 365–78. https://doi.org/10.14321/rhetpublaffa.24.1-2.0365.
Barnett, Joshua Trey, and David Charles Gore. 2020. “Dwelling in the Anthropocene: Notes from Lake Superior.” Ethics & the Environment 25 (1): 19–49.
Barnett, Scot, and Casey Andrew Boyle. 2017. “Introduction: Rhetorical Ontology, or How to Do Things with Things.” In Rhetoric, through Everyday Things, edited by Scot Barnett and Casey Andrew Boyle, 1–14. Tuscaloosa: The University of Alabama Press.
Bennett, Jane. 2010. “The Force of Things.” In Jane Bennett, Vibrant Matter, 1–19. Durham: Duke University Press. https://doi.org/10.1215/9780822391623-001.
Berlant, Lauren Gail. 2011. Cruel Optimism. Durham: Duke University Press. https://doi.org/10.1515/9780822394716.
Bost, Matthew, and Ronald Walter Greene. 2011. “Affirming Rhetorical Materialism: Enfolding the Virtual and the Actual.” Western Journal of Communication 75 (4): 440–44. https://doi.org/10.1080/10570314.2011.588902.
Braidotti, Rosi. 2010. “On Putting the Active Back into Activism.” New Formations 68 (68): 42–57. https://doi.org/10.3898/newf.68.03.2009.
Braidotti, Rosi. 2018. “Joy, Ethics Of.” In Posthuman Glossary, edited by Maria Hlavajova and Rosi Braidotti, 221–24. London: Bloomsbury academic.
Cates, Caleb, M. Lane Bruner, and Joseph T. Moss. 2018. “Recuperating the Real: New Materialism, Object-Oriented Ontology, and Neo-Lacanian Ontical Cartography.” Philosophy & Rhetoric 51 (2): 151–75. https://doi.org/10.5325/philrhet.51.2.0151.
Cloud, Dana L. 1994. “The Materiality of Discourse as Oxymoron: A Challenge to Critical Rhetoric.” Western Journal of Communication 58 (3): 141–63. https://doi.org/10.1080/10570319409374493.
Cloud, Dana L. 2018. Reality Bites: Rhetoric and the Circulation of Truth Claims in U.S. Political Culture. Columbus, Ohio: The Ohio State University Press.
Cloud, Dana L. 2020. “The Critique of Domination and the Critique of Freedom: A Gramscian Perspective: Commentary.” International Journal of Communication 14: 831–849.
Clough, Patricia Ticineto, and Jean Halley, eds. 2007. The Affective Turn: Theorizing the Social. Durham: Duke University Press.
Cvetkovich, Ann. 2012. Depression: A Public Feeling. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
Dehnert, Marco, Daniel C. Brouwer, and Lore/tta LeMaster. 2022. “Anti-Normativity under Duress: An Intersectional Intervention in Queer Rhetoric.” In The Routledge Handbook of Queer Rhetoric edited by Jacqueline Rhodes, Jonathan Alexander. London: Routledge.
Edbauer, Jenny. 2004. “Executive Overspill: Affective Bodies, Intensity, and Bush-in-Relation.” Postmodern Culture 15 (1). https://doi.org/10.1353/pmc.2004.0037.
Ewalt, Joshua P. 2018. “Points of Difference in the Study of More-than-Human Rhetorical Ontologies.” Rhetoric and Public Affairs 21 (3): 523–538. https://doi.org/10.14321/rhetpublaffa.21.3.0523.
Fraser, Nancy. 2023. Cannibal Capitalism: How Our System Is Devouring Democracy, Care, and the Planet - and What We Can Do about It. London New York: Verso.
Greene, Ronald Walter. 1998. “Another Materialist Rhetoric.” Critical Studies in Mass Communication 15 (1): 21–40. https://doi.org/10.1080/15295039809367031.
Greene, Ronald Walter, and Heather Ashley Hayes. 2012. “Rhetorical Materialism: The Cognitive Division of Labor and the Social Dimensions of Argument.” Argumentation and Advocacy 48 (3): 190–193. https://doi.org/10.1080/00028533.2012.11821769.
Gregg, Melissa, Gregory J. Seigworth, Sara Ahmed, Brian Massumi, Elspeth Probyn, and Lauren Berlant. 2010. The Affect Theory Reader. Durham: Duke University Press.
Hemmings, Clare. 2005. “INVOKING AFFECT: Cultural Theory and the Ontological Turn.” Cultural Studies (London, England) 19 (5): 548–567. https://doi.org/10.1080/09502380500365473.
Johnson, Gavin P. 2022. “(Queer) Optimism Ain’t (Im)Possible.” In The Routledge Handbook of Queer Rhetoric, edited by Jacqueline Rhodes, Jonathan Alexander. London: Routledge.
Koivunen, Anu. 2015. “Yes We Can? The Promises of Affect for Queer Scholarship.” Kvinder, Køn & Forskning, 3–4: 19–30. https://doi.org/10.7146/kkf.v0i3-4.28180.
Latour, Bruno. 2004. “Why Has Critique Run out of Steam? From Matters of Fact to Matters of Concern.” Critical Inquiry 30 (2): 225–248. https://doi.org/10.1086/421123.
Malm, Andreas. 2018. The Progress of This Storm: Nature and Society in a Warming World. London, UNITED KINGDOM: Verso. http://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/kbdk/detail.action?docID=5213241.
Massumi, Brian. 2002. Parables for the Virtual: Movement, Affect, Sensation. Post-Contemporary Interventions. Durham, N.C. ; Duke University Press.
McGee, Michael Calvin. 1982. “A Materialist’s Conception of Rhetoric.” In Explorations in Rhetoric: Studies in Honor of Douglas Ehninger, edited by Douglas Ehninger and Raymie E. McKerrow, 23–48. Glenview: Scott, Foresman.
McKerrow, Raymie E. 1989. “Critical Rhetoric: Theory and Praxis.” Communication Monographs 56 (2): 91–111. https://doi.org/10.1080/03637758909390253.
Morton, Timothy. 2017. Humankind: Solidarity with Nonhuman People. London ;Brooklyn, NY: Verso.
Muñoz, José Esteban. 2019. Cruising Utopia: The Then and There of Queer Futurity. 10th Anniversary edition. New York: University Press.
Oleksiak, Timothy, and Jonathan Alexander. 2021. “Queer Generosity: An Introduction from the Guest Editors.” QED: A Journal in GLBTQ Worldmaking 8 (3): 1–13.
Ott, Brian L., and Greg Dickinson. 2019. “Redefining Rhetoric: Why Matter Matters.” Berlin Journal of Critical Theory 3 (1): 45–81.
Paliewicz, Nicholas S. 2019. “Making Sense of the People’s Climate March: Towards an Aesthetic Approach to the Rhetoric of Social Protest.” Western Journal of Communication 83 (1): 94–112. https://doi.org/10.1080/10570314.2018.1446548.
Paliewicz, Nicholas S. 2023. “Thinking Like a Copper Mine: An Ecological Approach to Corporate Ethos and Prosōpon.” Rhetoric Society Quarterly 53 (2): 231–246. https://doi.org/10.1080/02773945.2022.2129757.
Pflugfelder, Ehren Helmut. 2015. “Rhetoric’s New Materialism: From Micro-Rhetoric to Microbrew.” Rhetoric Society Quarterly 45 (5): 441–461. https://doi.org/10.1080/02773945.2015.1082616.
Prasad, Pritha, and Louis M. Maraj. 2022. “‘I Am Not Your Teaching Moment’: The Benevolent Gaslight and Epistemic Violence 1.” College Composition and Communication 74 (2): 322–351.
Rickert, Thomas. 2013. Ambient Rhetoric: The Attunements of Rhetorical Being. 1st ed. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctt5hjqwx.
Sedgwick, Eve Kosofsky. 2003a. “Paranoid Reading and Reparative Reading, or, You’re So Paranoid, You Probably Think This Essay Is About You.” In Eve Kosofsky Sedgwick, Touching Feeling: Affect, Pedagogy, Performativity, 123–151. Durham: Duke University Press.
Sedgwick, Eve Kosofsky. 2003b. Touching Feeling: Affect, Pedagogy, Performativity. Durham: Duke University Press.
Sedgwick, Eve Kosofsky, and Adam Frank. 1995. “Shame in the Cybernetic Fold: Reading Silvan Tomkins.” Critical Inquiry 21 (2): 496–522.
Seegert, Natasha. 2014. “Play of Sniffication:” Philosophy & Rhetoric 47 (2): 158–178. https://doi.org/10.5325/philrhet.47.2.0158.
Svennevig, Kristian, Marie Keiding, Jacob Kidmose, Julian Koch, and Samuel Paul Jackson. 2024. “Jordskredsaktivitet Ved Nordic Waste, Randers Kommune: Redegørelse Baseret På Offentligt Tilgængelige Data.” De Nationale Geologiske Undersøgelser for Danmark og Grønland (GEUS). https://data.geus.dk/pure-pdf/GEUS-R_2024-6_web.pdf.
Tristano, Michael. 2022. “Performing Queer of Color Joy Through Collective Crisis: Resistance, Social Science, and How I Learned to Dance Again.” Cultural Studies ↔ Critical Methodologies 22 (3): 276–281. https://doi.org/10.1177/15327086221087671.
“USTC - Usædvanlig Tragisk Situation Resulterer i Konkurs for Nordic Waste.” 2024. January 19, 2024. https://ustc.dk/press/us%C3%A6dvanlig-tragisk-situation-resulterer-i-konkurs-for-nordic-waste.aspx.
Wander, Philip. 1983. “The Ideological Turn in Modern Criticism.” Central States Speech Journal 34 (1): 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1080/10510978309368110.
Zhang, Lei, and Carlton Clark, eds. 2019. Affect, Emotion, and Rhetorical Persuasion in Mass Communication. New York: Routledge.
Pobrania
Opublikowane
Wersje
- 01-07-2024 - (3)
- 30-06-2024 - (2)
- 30-06-2024 - (1)
Numer
Dział
Licencja
Prawa autorskie (c) 2024 Res Rhetorica
Utwór dostępny jest na licencji Creative Commons Uznanie autorstwa 4.0 Międzynarodowe.
Artykuły publikowane są na lincencji CC BY 4.0. Treść licencji jest dostępna tutaj: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
Artykuły opublikowane na licencji CC-BY (wersje postprint) mogą być udostępniane przez autorów każdemu, na dowolnej platformie lub za pośrednictwem dowolnego kanału komunikacyjnego pod warunkiem, że zostały przypisane do Res Rhetorica jako pierwotnego wydawcy.
