Who’s the ‘real’ transgender? The representation and stereotyping of the transgender community on YouTube
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.29107/rr2022.2.1Słowa kluczowe:
analiza retoryczna, reprezentacja, dyskurs transpłciowy, nowe media, YouTubeAbstrakt
The aim of this article is to provide an analytical introduction upon the ways of representation of transgender minority in new media. Through rhetorical analysis of selected content related to two high-profile transgender YouTubers, we identified five building blocks of given discourse: reduction of a structural problem to a personal one, reduction of a person’s reality to feelings, tokenization, psychiatrization of transgender identity, and ingroup gatekeeping.
Bibliografia
Barthes, Roland. 1975. “An Introduction to Structural Analysis of Narrative.” New Literary History 6(2): 237-272. doi: 10.2307/468419.
Bettcher, Talia M. 2007. “Evil Deceivers and Make-Believers: On Transphobic Violence and the Politics of Illusion.” Hypatia 22(3): 43-65. doi: http://www.jstor.org/stable/4640081
Bourdieu, Pierre. (1996) 1998. On Television, trans. Priscilla P. Ferguson. New York: New Press.
Bremond, Claude. 1980. “The Logic of Narrative Possibilities.” New Literary History 11(3): 387-411. doi: 10.2307/468934.
Butler, Judith. 1990. Gender Trouble: Feminism and Subversion of Identity. New York: Routledge.
Butler, Judith. 1993. Bodies That Matter: On the Discursive Limits of Sex. New York: Routledge.
Colliver, Ben, Adrian Coyle, and Marisa Silvestri. 2019. “The Online Othering of Transgender People in Relation to ‘Gender Neutral Toilets‘. In Online Othering: Exploring Digital Violence and Discrimination on the Web, eds. Lumsden, Karen, and Emily Harmer. London: Palgrave Macmillan, 215-237.
Da Costa, Jade Crimson Rose. 2021. “The “New” White Feminism: Trans-Exclusionary Radical Feminism and the Problem of Biological Determinism in Western Feminist Theory. In TransNarratives: Scholarly and Creative Works on Transgender Experience, eds. Carter, Kristi, and James Brunton. Toronto: Canadian Scholars’ Press, 317-335.
Darwin, Helena. 2020. “Challenging the Cisgender/Transgender Binary: Nonbinary People and the Transgender Label.” Gender & Society 34(3): 357-380. doi: 10.1177/0891243220912256
Deleuze, Gilles, and Félix Guattari. 1987. A Thousand Plateaus, trans. Brian Massumi. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
Dembroff, Robin. 2018. “Real Talk on Metaphysics of Gender.” Philosophical Topics 46(2): 21-50. doi:10.5840/philtopics201846212.
Dijk, Teun van. 2001. “Critical Discourse Analysis.” In The Handbook of Discourse Analysis, eds. Schriffin, Deborah, Tannen, Deborah and Heidi Hamilton. Oxford: Blackwell Publishers, 352-371.
Fairclough, Norman. (1989) 2013. Language and Power. 2nd Edition. London & New York: Routledge.
Fairclough, Norman. 1995. Media Discourse. New York: Bloomsbury Academic.
Fisher, Mark. 2009. Capitalist Realism: Is There No Alternative? Portland: Zero Books.
Foucault, Michel. (1969) 2002. The Archaeology of Knowledge, trans. A. M. Sheridan Smith. 2nd Edition. New York & London: Routledge.
Foucault, Michel. 1971. “Orders of Discourse.” Social Science Information 10(2): 7-30. doi: 10.1177/053901847101000201
Grad, Rojo. 2008. “Identities in Discourse: An Integrative View.” In Analysing Identities in Discourse, eds. Rosana Dolón, Júlia Todolí, 3-28. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing.
Halberstam, J. Jack. 1998. Female Masculinity. Durham; London: Duke University Press.
HealthyGamerGG. 2020. “Talking with ContraPoints – Gender Identity, Judgement, & YouTube.” YouTube. Accessed July 22, 2021. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cKrxP44Gp_0&t=1s
Horak, Laura. 2014. “Trans on YouTube: Intimacy, Visibility, Temporality.” Transgender Studies Quarterly 1(4): 572-585. doi:10.1215/23289252-2815255
Hoven, Paul van den. 2016. Gold Mining: The Art of Rhetorical Analysis. Xiamen: Xiamen University Press.
Kukla, Quill. 2014. “Performative Force, Convention, and Discursive Injustice.” Hypatia 29(2): 440-457. doi:10.1111/j.1527-2001.2012.01316.x.
Laing, Ronald. D. 1965. The Divided Self: An Existential Study in Sanity and Madness. New York: Penguin Books.
Leeuwen, Theo van. 2008. Discourse and Practice: New Tools for Critical Analysis. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Lyotard, Jean-Francois. 1989. The Differend: Phrases in Dispute. Minneapolis: Minnesota University Press.
Marantz, Andrew. 2018. “The Stylish Socialist Who Is Trying to Save YouTube from Alt-Right Domination.” The New Yorker. Accessed July 22, 2021. https://www.newyorker.com/culture/persons-of-interest/the-stylish-socialist-who-is-trying-to-save-youtube-from-alt-right-domination
Miller, Jordan F. 2018. “YouTube as a Site of Counternarratives to Transnormativity.” Journal of Homosexuality 66(6): 815-837. doi:10.1080/00918369.2018.1484629.
McInroy, Lauren B., and Shelley L. Craig. 2015. “Transgender Representation in Offline and Online Media: LGBTQ Youth Perspectives.” Journal of Human Behavior in the Social Environment 25(6): 606-617. doi:10.1080/10911359.2014.995392.
Quintilian. Institutes of Oratory, ed. J. S. Watson. London: George Bell & Sons, 1895.
Reisigl, Martin, and Ruth Wodak. 2001. Discourse and Discrimination: Rhetorics of Racism and Antisemitism. London & New York: Routledge.
Sales, Nancy Jo. 2021. “‘The internet is about jealousy’: YouTube muse ContraPoints on cancel culture and compassion.” The Guardian. Accessed July 22, 2021. https://www.theguardian.com/lifeandstyle/2021/jun/17/contrapoints-natalie-wynn-youtube-interview
Shilt, Kristen, and Laurel Westbrook. 2009. “Doing Gender, Doing Heteronormativity: 'Gender Normals,' Transgender People, and the Social Maintenance of Heterosexuality.” Gender and Society 23(4): 440-464. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/0891243209340034
Slightly Offens*ve. 2021. Christian Conservatives BATTLE Pro-LGBT Republicans | C-TMZ | Ep 134. YouTube. Accessed July 9, 2021. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=n9zICf5UH-E
Tenbarge, Kat. 2020. “A controversial transgender YouTuber apologized for making false claims about a transgender bodybuilder.” Insider. Accessed July 20, 2021. https://www.insider.com/blaire-white-apology-transphobic-video-janae-marie-kroc-transgender-bodybuilder-2020-10
Toulmin, Stephen. 2003. The Uses of Argument. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
VICE. 2019. “LGBTQ+ Community Debates the Meaning of "Queer", Military Bans, & More.” YouTube. Accessed July 10, 2021. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=utW1ItcMeJw&t=188s
White, Blaire. 2017. “Heated Debate w/ Genderqueer Feminist.” YouTube. Accessed July 8, 2021. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-SeCD8tJUhU&t=136s
White, Blaire. 2018. “DEBATE: Ben Shapiro & Blaire White.” YouTube. Accessed July 8, 2021. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hbTwoLah2VY
White, Blaire. 2019. “Exposing Jessica Yaniv: Trans Predator.” YouTube. Accessed July 8, 2021. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MI_lXO7zrAQ
White, Blaire. 2021a. “I Am..Disgusted. Chris Chan: ‘Trans’ Predator.” YouTube. Accessed July 8, 2021. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=A8cpjspKV8A
White, Blaire. 2021b. “Asking People at Pride How Many Genders There Are.” YouTube. Accessed July 8, 2021. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xCSpQ7nefIU
White, Blaire. 2021c. “THIS is Why the Trans Community Isn’t Respected (RANT).” YouTube. Accessed July 8, 2021. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6lhcud6nccE
Wynn, Natalie. 2018a. “Tiffany Tumbles | ContraPoints.” YouTube. Accessed July 8, 2021. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j1dJ8whOM8E
Wynn, Natalie. 2018b. “The Aesthetic | ContraPoints.” YouTube. Accessed July 8, 2021. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=z1afqR5QkDM&t=1116s
Wynn, Natalie. 2018c. “Pronouns | ContraPoints.” YouTube. Accessed July 8, 2021. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9bbINLWtMKI
Wynn, Natalie. 2019a. “Gender Critical | ContraPoints.” YouTube. Accessed July 8, 2021. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1pTPuoGjQsI
Wynn, Natalie. 2019b. “’Transtrenders’” | ContraPoints.” YouTube. Accessed July 8, 2021. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EdvM_pRfuFM&t=1862s
Wynn, Natalie. 2020. “Cringe | ContraPoints.” YouTube. Accessed July 8, 2021. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vRBsaJPkt2Q&t=956s
Pobrania
Opublikowane
Jak cytować
Numer
Dział
Licencja
Prawa autorskie (c) 2022 "Res Rhetorica"

Utwór dostępny jest na licencji Creative Commons Uznanie autorstwa 4.0 Międzynarodowe.
Artykuły publikowane są na lincencji CC BY 4.0. Treść licencji jest dostępna tutaj: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
Artykuły opublikowane na licencji CC-BY (wersje postprint) mogą być udostępniane przez autorów każdemu, na dowolnej platformie lub za pośrednictwem dowolnego kanału komunikacyjnego pod warunkiem, że zostały przypisane do Res Rhetorica jako pierwotnego wydawcy.