Memetic rhetorical theory: an analytic model for the spread of information online

Autor

  • Carleigh Davis Missouri University of Science and Technology

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.29107/rr2021.4.2

Słowa kluczowe:

memetyczna teoria retoryczna, mem, fakty alternatywne, etos

Abstrakt

Współczesny dyskurs często charakteryzuje się tak skrajną polaryzacją, że jego uczestnicy operują zupełnie innymi zestawami faktów. Te alternatywne fakty stanowią nową linię badawczą dla retoryków, którzy muszą ustalić, w jaki sposób fałszywe fakty zyskują wiarygodność. Niniejszy artykuł przedstawia Memetyczną Teorię Retoryczną (MRT), model pozwalający zrozumieć, w jaki sposób informacje ewoluują, by stać się wiarygodnymi w danym środowisku.

Bibliografia

Agboka, Godwin Y. 2014. “Decolonial methodologies: Social justice perspectives in intercultural technical communication research.” Journal of Technical Writing and Communication 44 (3): 297-327.

Andrews, Deborah C. 2017. “A Space for Place in Business Communication Research.” International Journal of Business Communication 54 (3): 325-336.

Barad, Karen. 2007. Meeting the universe halfway. Durham and London: Duke University Press.

Bar-Itzhak, Haya. 1999. “’The unknown variable hidden underground’ and the Zionist idea: Rhetoric of place in an Israeli kibbutz and cultural interpretation.” Journal of American Folklore 112: 497-513.

Beck, Estee N. 2015. “The invisible digital identity: Assemblages in digital networks.” Computers and Composition 35: 125-140. doi:10.1016/j.compcom.2015.01.005.

Bizzell, Patricia. 2006. “Frances Willard, phoebe palmer, and the ethos of the Methodist woman preacher.” Rhetoric Society Quarterly 36 (4): 377-398.

Blackmore, Susan J. 1999. The meme machine. Oxford, New York: Oxford University Press.

Bray, Francesca. 1997. Technology and gender: Fabrics of power in late imperial China. Los Angeles: University of California Press.

Brock, Kevin and Dawn Shepherd. 2016. “Understanding how algorithms work persuasively through the procedural enthymeme.” Computers and Composition 42: 17-27. doi:10.1016/j.compcom.2016.08.007.

Brodie, Richard. 2009. Virus of the mind: The new science of the meme. Seattle: Hay House, Inc.

Cillizza, Chris. 2017. “Sean Spicer held a press conference. He didn’t take questions. Or tell the whole truth.” The Washington Post, January 21.

Cloud, Dana. 2018. Reality Bites: Rhetoric and the Circulation of Truth Claims in U.S. Political Culture. Columbus: Ohio State University Press.

Dawkins, Richard. 1976. The selfish gene. New York; Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Dickinson, Greg, and Brian L. Ott. 2013. “Neoliberal capitalism, globalization, and lines of flight: Vectors and velocities at the 16th street mall.” Cultural Studies ↔ Critical Methodologies 13 (6): 529-535. doi:10.1177/1532708613503780.

Edbauer Rice, Jenny. 2005. “Unframing models of public distribution: From rhetorical situation to rhetorical ecologies.” Rhetoric Society Quarterly 35 (4): 5-24.

Edwards, Dustin, and Heather Lang. 2018. Entanglements that Matter. In Circulation, Writing, and Rhetoric, eds. Laurie E. Gries and Collin Gifford Brooke, 118- 134. Louisville: University Press of Colorado.

Endres, Danielle, Samantha Senda-Cook, and Brian Cozen. 2014. “Not just a place to park your car: PARK as spatial argument.” Argumentation and Advocacy 50 (3): 121-140.

Frost, Erin A. and Kelly Sharp-Hoskins. 2017. “Authorial ethos as location: How technical manuals embody authorial ethos without authors.” In Authorship contested: Cultural challenges to the authentic, autonomous author, eds. Amy E. Robillard and Ron Fortune, 71-88. New York: Routledge.

Frost, Erin A. and Angela M. Haas. 2017. “Seeing and knowing the womb: A technofeminist reframing of fetal ultrasound toward a decolonization of our bodies.” Computers and Composition 43: 88-105. doi:10.1016/j.compcom.2016.11.004.

Frostenson, Sarah. 2017. “A crowd scientist says Trump’s inauguration attendance was pretty average.” Vox, January 24.

Garrett, R. Kelly, Erik C. Nisbet, and Emily K. Lynch. 2013. “Undermining the corrective effects of media-based political fact checking? The role of contextual cues and naïve theory.” Journal of Communication 63 (4): 617-637.

Gries, Laurie. 2015. Still life with rhetoric. Boulder: Utah State University Press, Inc.

Haas, Angela M. 2012. “Race, rhetoric, and technology: A case study of decolonial technical communication theory, methodology, and pedagogy.” Journal of Business and Technical Communication 26 (3): 277-310. doi:10.1177/1050651912439539.

Hannak, Aniko, Drew Margolin, Brian Keegan, and Ingmar Weber. 2014. “Get back! You don’t know me like that: The social mediation of fact checking interventions in Twitter conversations.” Proceedings of the Eighth International AAAI Conference on Weblogs and Social Media. Ann Arbor: AAAI Press. https://www.aaai.org/ocs/index.php/ICWSM/ICWSM14/paper/view/8115.

Herndl, Carl G. 2012. “Rhetoric and the New Materialism.” Rhetoric Society of America Conference, Philadelphia, PA, May.

Herrick, James A. 2005. The history and theory of rhetoric: An introduction (3rd ed.). Boston: Allyn and Beacon.

hooks, bell. 2004. “Black vernacular: Architecture as cultural practice.” In Visual rhetoric in a digital world: A critical sourcebook, ed. Carolyn Handa, 395-400. Boston: Bedford/St. Martin’s.

Hunt, Elle. 2017. “Trump’s inauguration crowd: Sean Spicer’s claims versus the evidence.” The Guardian, January 22.

James, Craig A. 2010. The Religion Virus: Why we believe in God. Scotts Valley: John Hunt Publishing.

Johnson, Jim. 1988. “Mixing Human and Nonhumans Together: The Sociology of a Door-Closer.” Social Problems 35 (3): 298-310.

Latour, Bruno. 2005. Reassembling the social: An introduction to actor-network-theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Lessig, Lawrence. 2008. Remix: making art and commerce thrive in the hybrid economy. New York: Penguin Press.

Lewandowsky, Stephan, Ullrich K. H. Ecker, Colleen M. Seifert, Norbert Schwarz, and John Cook. 2012. “Misinformation and its correction: Continued influence and successful debiasing.” Psychological Science in the Public Interest 13 (3): 106-131.

Lynch, Aaron. 2008. Thought contagion: How belief spreads through society: The new science of memes. New York: Basic Books.

Lynch, Alejandro. 1996. “The population memetics of birdsong.” In Ecology and Evolution of Acoustic Communication in Birds, eds. Donald E. Kroodsma and Edward H. Miller, 181-1971. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.

Miller, Carolyn. 2004. “Expertise and Agency: Transformations of Ethos in Human-Computer Interaction.” In The Ethos of Rhetoric, ed. Michael Hyde, 197-218. Columbia: University of South Carolina Press.

Mohanty, Chandra T. 2003. “’Under western eyes’ revisited: Feminist solidarity through anticapitalist struggles.” Signs 28 (2): 499-535.

Nuklos, Ben. 2017. “Inaugural crowds sure to be huge—but how huge?” The Washington Times, January 18.

Pariser, Eli. 2011. Filter bubble: What the internet is hiding from you. New York: Penguin Press.

Pittman, Coretta. 2007. “Black women writers and the trouble with ethos: Harriet Jacobs, Billie Holiday, and Sister Souljah.” Rhetoric Society Quarterly 37 (1): 43-70.

Qiu, Linda. 2017. “Donald Trump had biggest inaugural crowd ever? Metrics don’t show it.” PolitiFact, January 21.

Reynolds, Nedra. 1993. “Ethos as location: New sites for understanding discursive authority.” Rhetoric Review 11 (2): 325-338. doi:10.1080/07350199309389009.

Rickert, Thomas J. 2013. Ambient rhetoric: The attunements of rhetorical being. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press.

Ridolfo, Jim and Danielle N. De Voss. 2009. “Composing for recomposition: Rhetorical velocity and delivery.” Kairos 13 (2).

Robertson, Lori and Robert Farley. 2017. “The facts on crowd size.” FactCheck.org, January 23.

Shelton, Cecilia D. 2019. On edge: A techné of marginality. Greenville: East Carolina University.

Shifman, Limor. 2014. Memes in digital culture. Cambridge: MIT press.

Shifman, Limor. 2013. “Memes in a digital world: Reconciling with a conceptual troublemaker.” Journal of computer-mediated communication 18 (3): 362-377.

Skinner, Carolyn. 2009. “’She will have science’: Ethos and audience in Mary Gove’s lectures to ladies.” Rhetoric Society Quarterly 39 (3): 240-259. doi:10.1080/02773940902766730.

Smith, Julia M. 2017. “A Gay Girl in Damascus: Multi-vocal Construction and Refutation of Authorial Ethos.” In Authorship contested: Cultural challenges to the authentic, autonomous author, eds. Amy E. Robillard and Ron Fortune, 21-39. New York: Routledge.

Soja, Edward W. 1989. Postmodern geographies: The reassertion of space in critical social theory. London: Verso.

Sperber, Dan. 2000. “An objection to the memetic approach to culture.” In Darwinizing culture: The status of memetics as a science, ed. Robert Aunger, 163-173. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Swarts, Jason. 2007. “Mobility and composition: The architecture of coherence in non-places.” Technical Communication Quarterly 16 (3): 279-309.

Wright, Elizabethada A. 2005. “Rhetorical spaces in memorial places: The cemetery as a rhetorical memory place/space.” Rhetoric Society Quarterly 35 (4): 51-81. doi:10.1080/02773940509391322.

Downloads

Opublikowane

2021-12-27

Jak cytować

Davis, Carleigh. 2021. „Memetic Rhetorical Theory: An Analytic Model for the Spread of Information Online”. "Res Rhetorica" 8 (4):40-53. https://doi.org/10.29107/rr2021.4.2.