Weapons, fire and dangerous men: multimodal argumentation of magazine covers featuring president Donald J. Trump

Autor

  • Dorota Miller Uniwersytet Rzeszowski

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.29107/rr2021.4.6

Słowa kluczowe:

multimodalność, okładki czasopism, argumentacja wizualna/multimodalna, Donald Trump, dyskurs medialny

Abstrakt

Artykuł poświęcony jest kodowi wizualnemu i werbalnemu oraz ich wzajemnym relacjom w argumentacji dominującej na brytyjskich i niemieckich okładkach czasopism poświęconych prezydentowi Donaldowi J. Trumpowi. W oparciu o koncepcję multimodalności i pojęcie entymematu autorka omawia analogię i kauzalność jako podstawowe typy argumentacji pojawiające się na okładkach tygodników THE ECONOMIST i DER SPIEGEL oraz ilustruje wkład komponentu wizualnego w (re-)konstrukcję pominiętych elementów argumentacji.

Bibliografia

Bateman, John. 2014. “Methodological and Theoretical Issues in Multimodality”. In Handbuch Sprache im multimodalen Kontext, ed. Nina-Maria Klug and Hartmut Stöckl, 36-74. Berlin and Boston: de Gruyter.

Blair, Anthony J. 2004. “The Rhetoric of Visual Arguments.” In Defining Visual Rhetorics, ed. Charles A. Hill and Marguerite Helmers, 41-61. Mahwah and London: LEA Publishers.

Eco, Umberto. 1989. The open work. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

Eco, Umberto. 1996. Nieobecna struktura. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo KR.

Foss, Sonja. 2004. “Theory of visual rhetoric.” In Handbook of Visual Communication: Theory, Methods and Media, ed. Kenneth L. Smith, Sandra Moriarty, Keith Kenney and Gretchen Barbatsis, 141-152, London: Routledge.

Fauconnier, Gilles, and Mark Turner. 2003. “Conceptual Blending, Form and Meaning.” Recherches en communication 19: 57-86.

Garssen, Bart J. 2001. “Argument schemes.” In Crucial concepts in argumentation theory, ed. Frans H. van Eemeren, 81-99. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.

Groarke, Leo. 2007. “Beyond words. Two dogmas of informal logic.” In Reason Reclaimed: Essays in Honor of J. Anthony Blair and Ralph H. Johnson, ed. Hans V. Hansen and Robert C. Pinto, 135-15. Newport News: Vale Press.

Hahn, Ulrike, Roland Bluhm, and Frank Zenker. 2017. “Causal argument.” In Oxford library of psychology. The Oxford handbook of causal reasoning, ed. Michael R. Waldmann, 475-493. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Held, Gudrun. 2005a. “Covers – ein multimodaler Kontakttext im aktuellen Info-Marketing.” In Pressetextsorten im Vergleich – Contrasting Text Types in the Press, ed. Harmut Lenk and Andrew Chesterman, 323-350. Hildesheim: Georg Olms.

Held, Gudrun. 2005b. “Magazine covers: A multimodal pretext-genre.” Folia Linguistica 39: 173-196.

Hommrich, Dirk, and Guido Isekenmeier. 2016. “Visual communication, popular science journals and the rhetoric of evidence.” Journal of Science Communication 15 (2): 1-8.

Kampka, Agnieszka. 2011. “Retoryka wizualna – perspektywy i pytania.” Forum Artis Rhetoricae 1: 7-23.

Kampka, Agnieszka. 2014. Debata publiczna. Warszawa: Oficyna Naukowa.

Kjeldsen, Jens E. 2012. “Pictorial argumentation in advertising: Visual tropes and figures as a way of creating visual argumentation.” In Topical themes in argumentation theory. Twenty exploratory studies, ed. Frans H. van Eemeren and Bart J. Garssen, 239-255. Dordrecht: Springer.

Kjeldsen, Jens E. 2015. “Where is visual argument?” In Reflections on Theoretical Issues in Argumentation Theory, ed. Frans H. van Eemeren and Bart J. Garssen, 107-117. Springer.

Kjeldsen. Jens E. 2018. “Visual rhetorical argumentation.” Semiotica 18 (220): 69-94.

Klug, Nina-Maria, and Hartmut Stöckl. 2014. Handbuch Sprache im multimodalen Kontext. Berlin and Boston: de Gruyter.

Kress, Gunther. 2011. “Multimodal discourse analysis.” In The Routledge Handbook of Discourse Analysis, ed. James Paul Gee and Michael Handford, 35-50. London: Routledge.

Kress, Gunther, and Theo Van Leeuwen. 2001. Multimodal Discourse: The Modes and Media of Contemporary Communication. London: Arnold.

Kroeber-Riel, Werner. 1993. BildKommunikation. München: Vahlen.

Kuhn, Deanna. 1991. The skills of argument. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Lakoff, George. 1987. Women, Fire, and Dangerous Things: What Categories Reveal About the Mind. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Mitchell, Thomas W. J. 1994. Picture Theory: Essays on Verbal and Visual Representation. Chicago and London: The University of Chicago Press.

Oestermeier, Uwe, and Friedrich W. Hesse. 2000. “Verbal and visual causal arguments.” Cognition 75 (1): 65-104.

Page, Janis Teruggi. 2020. “Trump as global spectacle: The visual rhetoric of magazine covers.” In Handbook of Visual Communication, ed. Josephson S. Sheree, Kelly James and Smith Ken et al., 139-151. London: Routledge.

Rocci, Andrea, and Chiara Pollaroli. 2018. “Introduction: Multimodality in argumentation.” Semiotica 18 (220): 1-17.

Schmitz, Ulrich. 2005. “Sehflächen lesen.“ Der Deutschunterricht 57 (4): 2-5.

Smith, Valerie J. 2007. “Aristotle’s classical enthymeme and the visual argumentation of the twenty first century.” Argumentation and Advocacy 43: 114-123.

Stöckl, Hartmut. 2004. “In Between Modes: Language and Image in Printed Media.” In Perspectives on Multi-Modality, ed. Eija Ventola, Cassily Charles and Martin Kaltenbacher, 9-30. Amsterdam: Benjamins.

Stöckl, Hartmut. 2014. „Multimodalität – Semiotische und textlinguistische Grundlagen.“ In Handbuch Sprache im multimodalen Kontext, ed. Nina-Maria Klug and Harmut Stöckl, 3-35. Berlin and Boston: de Gruyter.

Tseronis, Assimakis. 2015. “Multimodal argumentation in news magazine covers: A case study of front covers putting Greece on the spot of the European economic crisis.” Discourse, Context & Media 7: 18-27.

Tseronis, Assimakis. 2018a. “Determining the commitments of image-makers in arguments with multimodal allusions in the front covers of The Economist. Insights from Relevance Theory.” International Review of Pragmatics 10: 243-269.

Tseronis, Assimakis. 2018b. “Multimodal argumentation: Beyond the verbal/visual divide.” Semiotica 18 (220): 41-67.

Tseronis, Assimakis. 2021. “From visual rhetoric to multimodal argumentation: exploring the rhetorical and argumentative relevance of multimodal figures on the covers of The Economist.” Visual Communication 20(3): 374-396.

Van den Hoven, Paul, and Joost Schilperoord. 2017. “Perspective by incongruity: Visual argumentative meaning in editorial cartoons.” In Multimodal Argumentation and Rhetoric in Media Genres, ed. Assimakis Tseronis and Charles Forceville, 138-164. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

Walton, Douglas. 2008. “The three bases for the enthymeme: A dialogical theory.” Journal of Applied Logic 6: 361-379.

Walton, Douglas. 2014. “Argumentation Schemes for Argument from Analogy.” In Systematic Approaches to Argument by Analogy, ed. Henrique Jales Ribeiro, 23-40. Heidelberg, New York, Dordrecht, London: Springer.

Wengeler, Martin. 2003. Topos und Diskurs. Begründung einer argumentationsanalytischen Methode und ihre Anwendung auf den Migrationsdiskurs (1960-1985). Tübingen: Niemeyer.

Zuschlag, Christoph. 2012. “Die Kopie ist das Original: über Appropriation Art.“ In Déjà-vu? Die Kunst der Wiederholung von Dürer bis YouTube, ed. Ariane Mensger, 126-135. Karlsruhe: Kerber.

Downloads

Opublikowane

2021-12-27

Jak cytować

Miller, Dorota. 2021. „Weapons, Fire and Dangerous Men: Multimodal Argumentation of Magazine Covers Featuring President Donald J. Trump”. "Res Rhetorica" 8 (4):98-118. https://doi.org/10.29107/rr2021.4.6.