Kinship, Counterpublics, and Transnational Korean Adoptees

Sarah Idzik

Abstrakt


Counterpublic theories based on identity and oppositional politics have been challenged by theories demonstrating that counterpublics can be identified by their discursive marginalization from dominant publics. Yet discursive theories cloud possibilities of purpose based on kinship. Eleana J. Kim’s (2010) adoptee counterpublic incorporates an alternative form of kinship that reorients the discursive counterpublic toward a purpose, and points to possibilities of transformative worldmaking.


Pełny tekst:

PDF (English)

Bibliografia


Asen, Robert. 2000. “Seeking the ‘Counter’ in Counterpublics.” Communication Theory 10 (4): 424-446. https://doi-org.turing.library.northwestern.edu/10.1111/j.1468-2885.2000.tb00201.x.

Fraser, Nancy. 1990. “Rethinking the Public Sphere: A Contribution to the Critique of Actually Existing Democracy.” Social Text 25-26: 56-80. doi:10.2307/466240.

Habermas, Jurgen. [1962] 1989. The Structural Transformation of the Public Sphere: An Inquiry into a Category of Bourgeois Society. Translated by Thomas Burger and Frederick Lawrence. Cambridge: The MIT Press.

Kim, Eleana J. 2010. Adopted Territory: Transnational Korean Adoptees and the Politics of Belonging. Durham: Duke University Press.

Squires, Catherine. 2002. “Rethinking the Black Public Sphere: An Alternative Vocabulary for Multiple Public Spheres.” Communication Theory 12 (4): 446-468. https://doi-org.turing.library.northwestern.edu/10.1111/j.1468-2885.2002.tb00278.x.


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


##submission.license.cc.by4.footer##