Kinship, Counterpublics, and Transnational Korean Adoptees

Autor

  • Sarah Idzik Northwestern University

Abstrakt

Counterpublic theories based on identity and oppositional politics have been challenged by theories demonstrating that counterpublics can be identified by their discursive marginalization from dominant publics. Yet discursive theories cloud possibilities of purpose based on kinship. Eleana J. Kim’s (2010) adoptee counterpublic incorporates an alternative form of kinship that reorients the discursive counterpublic toward a purpose, and points to possibilities of transformative worldmaking.

Biogram autora

Sarah Idzik, Northwestern University

Sarah Idzik is a PhD student in Rhetoric and Public Culture at Northwestern University. She holds an MA in Literary and Cultural Studies from Carnegie Mellon University.

Bibliografia

Asen, Robert. 2000. “Seeking the ‘Counter’ in Counterpublics.” Communication Theory 10 (4): 424-446. https://doi-org.turing.library.northwestern.edu/10.1111/j.1468-2885.2000.tb00201.x.

Fraser, Nancy. 1990. “Rethinking the Public Sphere: A Contribution to the Critique of Actually Existing Democracy.” Social Text 25-26: 56-80. doi:10.2307/466240.

Habermas, Jurgen. [1962] 1989. The Structural Transformation of the Public Sphere: An Inquiry into a Category of Bourgeois Society. Translated by Thomas Burger and Frederick Lawrence. Cambridge: The MIT Press.

Kim, Eleana J. 2010. Adopted Territory: Transnational Korean Adoptees and the Politics of Belonging. Durham: Duke University Press.

Squires, Catherine. 2002. “Rethinking the Black Public Sphere: An Alternative Vocabulary for Multiple Public Spheres.” Communication Theory 12 (4): 446-468. https://doi-org.turing.library.northwestern.edu/10.1111/j.1468-2885.2002.tb00278.x.

Downloads

Opublikowane

2018-12-31

Jak cytować

Idzik, Sarah. 2018. „Kinship, Counterpublics, and Transnational Korean Adoptees”. "Res Rhetorica" 5 (4). https://resrhetorica.com/index.php/RR/article/view/309.