Seeing Bullshit Rhetorically: Human Encounters and Cultural Values
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.29107/rr2018.4.3Abstrakt
Autor eseju odnosi się do idei „wciskania kitu” (ang. bullshit) jako egzemplifikacji intuicjonistycznej teorii społecznej H. Merciera i D. Sperbera. Przywołuje wiele badań empiryczynych, poświęconych temu zjawisku, w tym te, które omawiają podział światopoglądów według osi indywidualizm vs komunitarianizm oraz hierarchia vs egalitaryzm w kontekście akceptacji bądź odrzucania idei. Odkrywanie „kitu” w przekazie dobrze odzwierciedla heurystykę afektu (lubię/nie lubię) oraz kognitywne mechanizmy obalania dezinformacji.
Pobrania
Bibliografia
Barnett, Randy. E. 2016. Our Republican Constitution. New York: HarperCollins.
Beaulac, Guillaume & Kenyon, Tim. 2018. “The scope of debiasing in the classroom.” Topoi 37: 93-102. Accessed October 5, 2018. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11245-016-9398-8
Chan, Man-Pui Sally, Jones, Christopher R., Hall, Jamieson, Kathleen, and Albarracin, Dolores. 2017.“Debunking: A meta-analysis of the psychological efficacy of messages countering misinformation.” Pychological Science 28 (11): 1531-1546.
Cohen, Gerald Allan. 2012. “Complete Bullshit.” In Finding Oneself in the Other. Princeton: Princeton University Press. Retrieved June 28, 2018, from Project MUSE database.
eResearch Methods.s.a. “What is your paradigm?”. Accessed October 5, 2018. http://www.erm.ecs.soton.ac.uk/theme2/what_is_your_paradigm.html
Evans, Jonathan. St. B. T., & Stanovich, Keith. E. 2013. “Dual-process theories of higher cognition: Advancing the debate.” Perspectives in Psychological Science 8: 223–241.
Festinger, Leon. 1957. A theory of cognitive dissonance. Evanston, IL: Row & Peterson.
Frankfurt, Harry. 2005. On bullshit. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.
Fredal, James. 2011. “Rhetoric and Bullshit.” College English 73 (3): 243-259.
Galef, Julia. 2016. “Why you think you’re right—even if you are wrong”. Ted.com. Accessed October 5, 2018. http://www.ted.com/talks/julia_galef_why_you_think_you_re_right_even_if_you_re_wrong?language=en&utm_campaign=social&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=facebook.com&utm_content=talk&utm_term=humanities
Gilovich, Tom., & Ross, Lee. 2017. The wisest one in the room. London: Oneworld.
Haidt, Jonathan. 2001. “The emotional dog and its rational tail: A social intuitionist approach to moral judgment.” Psychological Review 104, (4): 814-834.
Hyman, Ira E. & Jalbert, Madeline C. 2017. “Misinformation and worldviews in the post-truth information age: Commentary on Lewandowsky, Ecker, and Cook.” Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition 6: 377-381.
Kahan, Dan M., Braman, Donald, Gastil, John, Slovic, Paul, & Mertz, C.K. 2007. “Culture and Identity-Protective Cognition: Explaining the White Male Effect in Risk Perception.”. Research Paper No. 152. Social Science Research Network Electronic Paper Collection. Accessed October 5, 2018. http://papers.ssrn.com/abstract=995634
Kahan, Dan M., Hoffman, David A., Braman, Donald, Evans, Danieli, & Rachlinski, Jeffrey J. 2012. They saw a protest: Cognitive illiberalism and the speech-conduct distinction. Stanford Law Review 64: 851-906.
Kahneman, Daniel. 2011. Thinking, fast and slow. New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux.
Kimbrough, Scott. 2006. “On letting it slide.” In Bullshit and philosophy, eds. Gary Hardcastle & George Reisch, 3-18. Chicago: Open Court.
Levine, Timothy. R. & Kim, Rachel K. 2010. “Some considerations for a new theory of deceptive communication.” In The interplay of truth and deception, eds. Matthew S. McGlone & Mark L. Knapp, 16-34. New York: Routledge.
McGlone, Matthew. S., & Knapp, Mark L. (Eds.). 2010. The interplay of truth and deception. New York: Routledge.
Mears, Daniel P. 2002. “The Ubiquity, Functions, and Contexts of Bullshitting.” Journal of Mundane Behavior, 3 (2), 223–256.
Mercier, Hugo, & Sperber, Dan. 2017. The enigma of reason. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press.
Mooney, Chris. 2013. “The science of why we don’t believe science.” Medium.com, June 18, 2013. Accessed October 5, 2018. https://medium.com/mother-jones/the-science-of-whywe-dont-believe-science-adfa0d026a7e
Pennycook, Gordon, Cheyne, James A., Barr, Nathaniel, Koehler, Derek J. and Fugelsang, Jonathan A. 2015. “On the reception and detection of pseudo-profound bullshit.” Judgment and Decision Making 10 (6): 549-563. Accessed October 5, 2018. http://journal.sjdm.org/15/15923a/jdm15923a.html
Petty, Richard. E., and Cacioppo, John T. 1986. “The Elaboration Likelihood Model of Persuasion.” Advances in Experimental Social Psychology 19: 123-205.
Perla, Rocco J. & Carifio, James. 2007. “Psychological, Philosophical, and Educational Criticisms of Harry Frankfurt’s Concept of and Views About “Bullshit” in Human Discourse, Discussions, and Exchanges.” Interchange 38 (2): 119–136.
Postman, Neil. November 28, 1969. “Bullshit and the Art of Crap Detection” Paper, delivered at the National Convention for the Teachers of English [NCTE], Washington, D.C.
Reisch, George A. 2006. “The pragmatics of bullshit, intelligently designed.” In Bullshit and Philosophy, eds. Gary Hardcastle & George Reisch. Chicago: Open Court.
Richardson, Alan. 2006. “Performing bullshit and the post-sincere condition.” In Bullshit and Philosophy, eds. Gary Hardcastle & George Reisch. Chicago: Open Court.
Ross, Lee, Greene, David, & House, Pamela. 1977. “The false consensus effect: An egocentric bias in social perception and attribution processes.” Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 13 (3): 279-301.
Searle, John R. 1969. Speech Acts: An Essay in the Philosophy of Language. London, Cambridge University Press.
Sherif, Muzafer, Sherif, Carolyn, & Nebergall, Roger E. 1965. Attitude and attitude change: The Social Judgment-Involvement Approach. Philadelphia, PA: W. B. Saunders.
Taylor, Kenneth A. 2006. “Bullshit and the foibles of the human mind, or: What the masters of the dark arts know.” In Bullshit and philosophy, eds. Gary Hardcastle & George Reisch. Chicago: Open Court.
Toplak, Maggie E., West, Richard F., & Stanovich, Keith. E. 2011. “The Cognitive Reflection Test as a predictor of performance on heuristics-and-biases tasks.” Memory & Cognition, 39: 1275–1289.
Tuschman, Avi. 2013. Our Political Nature: The Evolutionary Origins of What Divides Us. Amherst, New York: Prometheus Books.
Pobrania
Pliki dodatkowe
Opublikowane
Numer
Dział
Licencja
Artykuły publikowane są na lincencji CC BY 4.0. Treść licencji jest dostępna tutaj: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
Artykuły opublikowane na licencji CC-BY (wersje postprint) mogą być udostępniane przez autorów każdemu, na dowolnej platformie lub za pośrednictwem dowolnego kanału komunikacyjnego pod warunkiem, że zostały przypisane do Res Rhetorica jako pierwotnego wydawcy.
