Does Film Keep Anti-psychiatry Alive? Aesthetic Knowledge of Mental Illness and Institutions

Autor

  • Jette Barnholdt Hansen University of Copenhagen

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.17380/rr2015.4.3

Abstrakt

The paper aims at evaluating contemporary fi lms on psychiatry and their ‘knowledge’ of mental illness: How are mental illness and psychiatric institutions characterized rhetorically, and, are some psychiatric theories more present than others in the epistemological development of the fi lms? I will argue that the film ‘One Flew Over the Cuckoo’s Nest’ (1975) by Milos Forman has an iconic status. It was based on a novel by Ken Kesey from 1961 and can be related to anti-psychiatry – a political movement as well as a psychiatric theory infl uenced by social constructivism, e.g. Michel Foucault. In The Divided Self (1960) by Ronald D. Laing and The Myth of Mental Illness (1962) by Thomas Szasz conventional psychiatric language was deconstructed. Thus, Szasz pleaded that mental illness did not exist and built up a new effective antipsychiatric language characterized by metaphors such as ‘prison’ and ‘prisoner’. These metaphors were given both presence (Perelman) and evidentia by Forman, who focused on clanking keys, bars, and belt fi xation in the introduction to ‘One Flew Over the Cuckoo’s Nest’. Also contemporary movies dealing with psychiatry, such as ‘Girl Interrupted’ (1999) by James Mangold, use the prison as a metaphor, probably as an intertextual reference to Forman’s fi lm. In the end of the paper I will discuss the effect of these movies. Do they keep anti-psychiatry alive in the 21th century – even when the psychiatric theory as well as the political movement have lost infl uence?

Bibliografia

Burke, Kenneth. 1969. A Rhetoric of Motives. Berkeley, Los Angeles, London: University of California Press.

Dain, Norman. 1994. ”Psychiatry and Anti-Psychiatry in the United States”. In: Discovering the History of Psychiatry. Ed. Mark S. Micale and Roy Porter. New York: Oxford University Press.

Forman, Milos [1975] (2002). Gøgereden. Fantasy Films.

Hariman, Robert and John Louis Lucaites. 2003. ”Public Identity and Collective Memory in U.S: Iconic Photography: The Image of »Accidental Napalm«”. Critical Studies in Media Communication, March, 35-66.

Hellspong, Lennart. 2000.”Berättelser i argumentation”. Rhetorica Scandinavica, No. 16, 26-33.

Laing, R. D. 1973. The Divided Self. An Existential Study in Sanity and Madness. Middlesex: Penguin Books.

Kotowicz, Zbigniew. 1997. R.D. Laing and the Paths of Anti-psychiatry. New York: Routledge.

Meyer, John. 2000. ”Humor as a Double-Edged Sword: Four Functions of Humor in Communication.” Communication Theory 10, 310–331.

Oliver, Jeffrey. 2006. ”The Myth of Thomas Szasz”. The New Atlantis 13, 68-84.

Perelman, Chaïm. 1990. The New Rhetoric. A Theory of Practional Reasoning. (The Rhetorical Tradition. Readings from Classical Times to the Present. Ed. Bizzell, Patricia & Herzberg, Bruce) Boston: St. Martin’s Press.

Shorter, Edward. 1997. A History of Psychiatry. New York: John Wiley & Sons.

Szasz, Thomas. 1961. The Myth of Mental Illness. New York: Dell Publishing.

Szasz, Thomas.1991. The Myth of Mental Illness. Foundations of a Theory of Personal Conduct. New York and Evanston: Harper & Row, Publishers.

Jak cytować

Hansen, Jette Barnholdt. 2015. „Does Film Keep Anti-Psychiatry Alive? Aesthetic Knowledge of Mental Illness and Institutions”. "Res Rhetorica" 2 (4). https://doi.org/10.17380/rr2015.4.3.