The nature and development of argumentative skills in children: Current research

Jolanta Rytel

Abstrakt


Development of argumentative skills is crucial to the acquisition of a rhetorical competence. The focus of this article is the development of children’s use of argument. The article presents a review of research, which indicate that children develop argumentative skills early, already at preschool age. These research show that already the preschool children have considerable skills in the use of argumentation not only as a means of reaching the agreement in contentious issues, but also as a tool by which they jointly consider the possibility of acceptance of views expressed.

Pełny tekst:

PDF (English)

Bibliografia


Arystoteles. Retoryka – Poetyka. Warszawa 1988: Państwowe Wydawnictwo Naukowe.

Barbieri, M. S., Colavita, F., Scheuer, N. (1990). The beginning of the explaining capacity. In: G. Conti-Ramsden, C. E. Snow (Eds.), Children’s language. Volume 7 (pp. 245-271). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

Billig, M. (1996). Arguing and thinking: A rhetorical approach to social psychology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Douglass, R. B. (1974). An Aristotelian orientation to rhetorical communication. “Philosophy & Rhetoric”, 7 (2), 80-88.

Dunn, J., Munn, P. (1987). Development of justifi cation in disputes with mother and sibling. “Developmental Psychology”, 23, 791-798.

van Eemeren, F. H., Garssen, B. (2009). Analysis and evaluation of argumentative discourse. In: J.Renkema (Ed.), Discourse, of Course. An overview of research in discourse studies (pp. 171-185). Amsterdam: Benjamins.

van Eemeren, F. H., Grootendorst, R. (1984). Speech acts in argumentative disscussion. Dordrecht – Holland: Foris.

van Eemeren, F. H., Grootendorst, R. (1987). For reason’s sake: maximal argumentative analysis of discourse. In: F. H. van Eemeren, J. A. Blair, C. A. Willard (Eds.), Across the lines of discipline. Proceedings of the conference on argumentation 1986 (pp. 201-215). Dordrecht – Holland: Foris.

van Eemeren, F. H., Grootendorst, R. (1988). A pragma-dialectical perspective on norms. In: R. Maier (Ed.), Norms in argumentation (pp. 97-112). Dordrecht – Holland: Foris.

van Eemeren, F. H., Grootendorst, R. (1991). The study of argumentation from a speech act perspective. In: J. Verschueren (Ed.), Pragmatics at issue. Vol 1: Selected papers of the International Pragmatics Conference, Antwerp – 1987 (pp. 151-170). Amsterdam: Benjamins.

van Eemeren, F.H., Grootendorst, R. (2004). A systematic theory of argumentation: The pragma--dialectical approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

van Eemeren, F. H., Grootendorst, R., Kruiger, T. (1987). Handbook of argumentation theory.Dordrecht – Holland: Foris.

van Eemeren, F. H., Jackson, S., Jacobs, S. (2011). Argumentation. In: T. A. van Dijk (Ed.),Discourse Studies: A Multidisciplinary Introduction (pp. 85-106). Second Edition. London: Sage Publications Ltd.

Eisenberg, A. R., Garvey, C. (1981). Children’s use of verbal strategies in resolving confl icts. “Discourse Processes”, 4, 149–170.

Goetz, P. J. (2010). The development of verbal justifi cations in the conversations of preschool children and adults. “First Language”, 30, 403-420.

Goetz, P. J., Shatz, M. (1999). When and how peers give reasons: justifi cations in the talk of middle--school children. “Journal of Child Language”, 26, 721-748.

Goldstein, M., Crowell, A., Kuhn, D. (2009). What constitutes skilled argumentation and how does it develop? “Informal Logic”, 29, 379-395.

Jackson, S. (1987). Rational and pragmatic aspect of argumentation. In: F. H. van Eemeren, J. A. Blair, C. A. Willard (Eds.), Across the lines of discipline. Proceedings of the conference on argumentation

(pp. 217- 228). Dordrecht – Holland: Foris.

Jackson, S. (1989). What can argumentative practices tell us about argumentation norms?. In: R. Maier (Ed.), Norms in argumentation (pp. 113-122). Dordrecht – Holland: Foris.

Jackson, S., Jacobs, S. (1980). Structure of conversational argument: pragmatic bases for the enthymeme. “The Quarterly Journal Of Speech”, 66, 251-265.

Jacobs, S. (1986). How to make an argument from example in discourse analysis. In: D. G. Ellis,W. A. Donohue (Eds.), Contemporary issues in language and discourse processes (pp. 149-167).Hillsdale, NY: Lawrence Erlbaum.

Jacobs, S. (1987). The management of disagreement in conversation. In: F. H. van Eemeren, J. A.Blair, C. A. Willard (Eds.), Across the lines of discipline. Proceedings of the conference on argumentation 1986 (pp. 229-239). Dordrecht – Holland: Foris.

Jacobs, S., Jackson, S. (1981). Argument as a natural category: The routine grounds for arguing in conversation. “The Western Journal Of Speech Communication”, 45, 118-132.

Jacobs, S., Jackson, S. (1982). Conversational argument: A discourse analytic approach. In: J. R. Cox, C. A. Willard (Eds.), Advances in argumentation theory and research (pp. 205-237).Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press.

Jacobs, S., Jackson, S. (1983). Strategy and structure in conversational infl uence attempts, “Communication Monographs”, 50, 285- 304.

Jacobs, S., Jackson, S. (1983a). Speech act structure in conversation. Rational aspects of pragmatic coherence. In: R. T. Craig, K. Tracy (Eds.), Conversational coherence: Form, structure and strategy (pp. 47-66). Beverly Hill: Sage.

Kyratzis, A., Ross, T. S., Koymen, B. (2010). Validating justifi cations in preschool girls’ and boys’ friendship group talk: implications for linguistic and socio-cognitive development. “Journal of Child Language”, 37, 115–144.

Levinson, S. C. (1983). Pragmatics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Oaksford, M., Chater, N., Hahn, U. (2008). Human reasoning and argumentation: The probabilistic approach. In: J. Adler, L. Rips (Eds.), Reasoning: Studies of human inference and its foundations

(pp. 383-413). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

Mercer, N. (1996). The quality of talk in children’s collaborative activity in the classroom. “Learning and Instruction”, 6 (4), 359-377.

Mercer, N. (2003). Helping children to talk and think together more effectively. “Polifonia”, 7, 1-26.

Mercier, H. (2011). Reasoning serves argumentation in children. “Cognitive Development”, 26,177-191.

Mercier, H., Sperber, D. (2011). Why do humans reason? Arguments for an argumentative theory. “Behavioral and Brain Sciences”, 34, 57-111.

O’Keefe, D. J. (1982). The concept of argument and arguing. In: J. R. Cox, C. A. Willard (Eds.), Advances in argumentation research (pp. 3-23). Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press.

Orsolini, M. (1990). Arguing in social symbolic play and other contexts. Paper presented at the IVth European Conference on Developmental Psychology, Stirling (August, 1990).

Orsolini, M. (1993). Because in children’s discourse. “Applied Psycholinguistics”, 14, 89-120.

Rytel, J. (2005). Is disagreement necessary? Argumentation in preschoolers’ narrative discourse.In: B. Bokus (Ed.), Studies in the psychology of child language (pp. 313 – 327). Warsaw: Matrix.

Rytel, J. (2009). Arguing for persuading and arguing for exploring. “Psychology of Language and Communication” 13 (1), 21-38.

Rytel, J. (2012). Reaching an agreement: Argumentation in preschoolers’ narrative discourse. Warsaw: Cardinal Stefan Wyszyński University Press.

Snoeck Henkemans, A. F. (2014). Speech act theory and study of argumentation. “Studies in Logic,Grammar and Rhetoric”, 36 (49), 41-58.

Thornberg, R. (2006). The situated nature of preschool children’s confl ict strategies. “Educational Psychology”, 26, 109-126.

Wootton, A. J. (1981). The management of grantings and rejections by parents in request sequences, “Semiotica”, 59-86.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.17380/rr.v1i1.8

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.