Frame construction in post-15M discourses

ESPERANZA MORALES-LÓPEZ

Abstrakt


This paper offers an analysis of ideological discourse from a constructivist perspective, according to which reality is interpreted as the socially constructed product of different agents interacting on an individual, subjective basis in a particular socio-political context, and in relation to a specifi c social action. This theoretical and methodological approach also highlights the importance of the relationship between the fi eld of discourse analysis and those of rhetoric and argumentation (and semiotics, where the discourse is multimodal), and complexity studies. The paper uses data from an ethnographic study of a social collective created a year before the 15M movement: the Cooperativa Integral Catalana (‘Catalan Integral Cooperative’), an eco-social economic initiative based on a new form of self-managed cooperativism.

Pełny tekst:

PDF (English)

Bibliografia


Aristóteles. Edition 1990. Retórica. Madrid: Gredos.

Bateson, Gregory. 1972. Steps to an ecology of mind. New York: Ballantine Books.

Berger, Peter L. and Luckmann, Thomas [1966] 1986. La construcción social de la realidad. Buenos Aires: Amorrortu Editores.

Blommaert, Jan. 2005. Discourse. A critical introduction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Bourdieu, Pierre. 1990. Language as symbolic power. Cambridge: Polity Press.

Capra, Fritjof. 1996. La trama de la vida. Una nueva perspectiva de los sistemas vivos. Barcelona: Anagrama.

Castoriadis, Cornelius. 1975. L’institution imaginaire de la société. Paris: Seuil.

Chilton, Paul. 2004. Analyzing political discourse. Theory and Practice. London: Routledge.

Damasio, Antonio R. 2010. Y el cerebro creó al hombre. ¿Cómo pudo el cerebro generar emociones, sentimientos y el yo? Barcelona: Destino [Original title: Self comes to mind: Constructing the Conscious Brain.].

Duranti, Alexandro. [1997] 2000. Antropología lingüística. Madrid: Cambridge University Press.

Eco, Umberto. 1976. Signo. Barcelona: Labor.

Fairclough, Norman. 2001. ‘El análisis crítico del discurso como método para la investigación en ciencias sociales’. In Wodak, Ruth and Meyer, Michael eds. Métodos de análisis crítico del discurso. Barcelona: Gedisa, 179-203.

Fairclough, Norman and Fairclough, Isabela. 2012. Political discourse analysis. A method for advanced students. London: Routledge.

Filardo-Llamas, Laura. 2015. “Re-contextualizing political discourse.” Critical Discourse Studies 12 (3), 279-296.

Fillmore, Charles. 1982. “Frame Semantics.” In: The Linguistic Society of Korea (ed.) Linguistics in the Morning Calm. Seoul: Hanshin Publishing Co., 111-137.

Goffman, Erving. 1974. Frame analysis: An essay on the organization of experience. New York: Harper and Row.

Habermas, Jürgen. 1981. Teoría de la acción comunicativa. I – Racionalidad de la acción y racionalización Social. Madrid: Taurus.

Harré, Rom. 1981. “Rituals, rhetoric and social cognition.” In Joseph Forgas ed. Social cognition. Perspectives on everyday understanding. New York: Academic Press, 211-224.

Hayakawa, Samuel I. 1973. Language in thought and action. London: George Allen and Unwin.

Horkheimer, Max. 1972. Critical theory. Selected essays. New York: Continuum.

Lakoff, George. 2007. No pienses en un elefante: Lenguaje y debate político. Madrid: Editorial Complutense.

Lakoff, George and Johnson, Mark. 1980. Metaphors we live by. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.

Langacker, Ronald W. 1987. Foundations of cognitive grammar. Vol. 1. Stanford: Stanford University Press.

Larsen-Freeman, Diane and Cameron, Lynne. 2008. Complex systems and applied linguistics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Massip-Bonet, Àngels. 2013. “Language as a complex adaptative system: Towards an integrative linguistics.” In Massip-Bonet, Àngels and Bastardas-Boada, Albert eds. Complexity perspectives on language, communication and society. Berlin – Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag, 35-60.

Maturana, Humberto. 1996. La realidad: ¿objetiva o construida? Vol. 2. Barcelona – México DF: Anthropos, Universidad Iberoamericana.

Maturana, Humberto. 2006. “Self-consciousness: How? When? Where?.” Constructivist Foundations 1 (3), 91-102.

Maturana, Humberto and Varela, Francisco. 1992. The tree of knowledge. The biological roots of human understanding. Boston: Shambhala.

Meneses, Aldo; Demanet, Alain; Baeza, Constanza and Castillo, Javier. 2012. “El movimiento zapatista: impacto político de un discurso en construcción.” Revista Enfoques 10 (16), 151-174.

Molpeceres Arnáiz, Sara. 2014. Mito persuasivo y mito literario. Bases para un análisis retórico-mítico del discurso. Valladolid: Universidad de Valladolid.

Montesano Montessori, Nicolina and Morales-López, Esperanza. 2015. ‘Multimodal narrative as an instrument for social change: reinventing democracy in Spain – the case of 15M’. Critical Approaches to Discourse Analysis Across Disciplines (CADAAD) 7 (2), 200-219 (http://www.cadaad.net/journal).

Morales-López, Esperanza. 2004. “Las aproximaciones americanas al análisis del discurso oral: perspectivas de future.” In Pujante, David ed. Caminos de la Semiótica en la última década del siglo XX. Valladolid: Universidad de Valladolid, 109-123.

Morales-López, Esperanza. 2011. ‘Hacia dónde va el Análisis del Discurso’. Tonos Digital 21.(http://www.um.es/tonosdigital/znum21/secciones/estudios-21-discurso.htm).

Morales-López, Esperanza. 2012. “Discourses of social change in contemporary democracies: The ideological construction of an Ecuadorian women’s group based on solidarity economy and finance.” Text and Talk. An interdisciplinary Journal of Language, Discourse and Communication Studies 32 (3), 329-348.

Morales-López, Esperanza. 2013. “Anàlisi del discurs i complexitat.” Llengua, societat i comunicació 11, 55-61 (http://revistes.ub.edu/index.php/LSC).

Morales-López, Esperanza. 2014°. “La refl exión meta-discursiva como función comunicativa en el proceso de construcción de los discursos de cambio social en un grupo de mujeres.” Sociolinguistic Studies 8 (2), 249-269.

Morales-López, Esperanza. 2014b. “Etnografía.” (www.ub.edu/diccionarilinguistica).

Morales-López, Esperanza. [forthcoming] “Discourse analysis: Constructivist perspective and transdisciplinarity.” In Albert Bastardas-Boada, Àngels Massip-Bonet and Gemma Bel-Enguix eds. Applications of complexity theory in language and communication sciences.

Munck, Ronaldo and O’Hearn, Denis eds. 1999. Critical Development Theory: Contributions to a New Paradigm. London – New York: Zed Books.

Ojeda, César. 2001. ‘Francisco Varela y las ciencias cognitivas’. Revista Chilena de Neuro-Psiquiatría 39 (4), 286-295. (http://dx.doi.org/10.4067/S0717-92272001000400004).

Pujante, David. 2003. Manual de Retórica. Madrid: Castalia.

Pujante, David and Morales-López, Esperanza. 2008. “A political action against popular opinion: Aznar’s fi nal speech before the Spanish Parliament justifying the war in Iraq (December 2003).” Journal of Language and Politics 7 (1), 71-96 [updated version: 2009, Discurso & Sociedad 3 (4), 769-806, www.dissoc.org].

Pujante, David and Morales-López, Esperanza. 2009. “Los aspectos argumentativos de las respuestas de Rajoy a un grupo de ciudadanos en el programa de televisión española Tengo una pregunta para usted.” Oralia 12, 359-392.

Pujante, David and Morales-López, Esperanza. 2013. “Discurso (discurso político), constructivismo y retórica: los eslóganes del 15-M.” Language, Discourse & Society 2 (2), 32-59 (http://www.language-and-society.org/journal/issues.html).

Salvador, Vicent. 2014. “El debate social sobre las fuentes de energía: representaciones semánticas y gestión social de los conocimientos.” Culture, Language and Representation 13, 221-243.

Scollon, Ron. 2001. “Acción y texto: para una comprensión conjunta del lugar del texto en la (inter) acción social, el análisis mediato del discurso y el problema de la acción social.” In Wodak, Ruth and Meyer, Michael eds. Métodos de análisis crítico del discurso. Barcelona: Gedisa, 205-265.

Scollon, Ron. 2008. Analizing public discourse. Discourse analysis in the making of public policy. London – New York: Routledge.

Scollon, Ron and Wong Scollon, Susanne. 2001. Intercultural Communications. Malden, Mass.: Blackwell.

Scollon, Ron and Wong Scollon, Susanne. 2005. “Lighting the stove. Why habitus isn’t enough for Critical Discourse Analysis.” In Ruth Wodak and Paul Chilton eds. A new agenda in (Critical) Discourse Analysis. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 101-117.

Searle, John. [1969] 1980. Actos de habla. Madrid: Cátedra.

Somers, Margaret R. 1994. “The narrative constitution of identity: A relational and network approach.” Theory and Society 23, 605-649.

Sousa Santos, Boaventura de. 2005. El milenio huérfano. Ensayos para una nueva cultura política. Madrid: Trotta.

van Dijk, Teun A. 2003. Ideología y discurso. Barcelona: Ariel.

Varela, Francisco; Thompson, Evan and Rosch, Eleanor. 1992. The Embodied Mind: Cognitive Science and Human Experience. Cambridge, Massachussets: The MIT Press.

Verschueren, Jef. 1999. Understanding Pragmatics. London: Arnold.

Vico, Giambattista. [1744] 1984. The New Science. New York: Cornell University Press.

Vilarroya, Óscar. 2014. “Una comunicación sense información basada en vivències.” In Massip-Bonet, Àngels and Bastardas-Boada, Albert eds. Complèxica. Cervell, societat i llengua des de la transdisciplinarietat. Barcelona: Universitat de Barcelona: 39-54.

Voloshinov, Valentin N. [1929] 1992. El marxismo y la Filosofía del lenguaje. Madrid: Alianza.

Werth, Paul. 1999. Text worlds: representing conceptual space in discourse. London: Longman.

White, Hayden. [1987] 1992. El contenido de la forma. Narrativa, discurso y representación histórica. Barcelona: Paidós.

White, Hayden. 2004. “Figural realism in witness literature.” Parallax 10 (1), 113-124.

White, Hayden. 2008. “The historical event.” A Journal of Feminist Cultural Studies 19 (2), 9-34.

Wodak, Ruth; De Cillia, Rudolf; Reisigl, Martin and Liebhart, Karin. 1999. The discursive construction of national identity. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.

Žižek, Slavoj. 2009. En defensa de la intolerancia. Madrid: Sequitur.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.17380/rr2016.1.4

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.