Feminist Rhetorical Praxis: Everyday Feminism as Public Agora

Amanda Wray, Elise Verzosa Hurley

Abstrakt


W artykule analizie poddano feministyczne strategie retoryczne występujące na stronie internetowej Everyday Feminism. Skupiając się na społecznym obiegu witryny (Royster i Kirsch 2012), autorki twierdzą, że strona Everyday Feminism pełni funkcję publicznej agory, gdzie cyberfeministyczne praktyki retoryczne (Blair, Gajjala i Tulley 2009) mają wyjątkową możliwość dotarcia do masowego odbiorcy i zaistnienia w mediach społecznościowych, po to, by edukować, udzielać wsparcia, inicjować dialog i budować porozumienia na granicy różnic, czasu i przestrzeni.

Pełny tekst:

PDF (English)

Bibliografia


Alcoff, Linda Martín. 1998. “What Should White People Do?” Hypatia 13(3): 6-26.

Banned By Everyday Feminism. “About.” Accessed March 30, 2016. https://www.facebook.com/BannedByEverydayFeminism/?fref=nf

Berry, Wendell. 1989. The Hidden Wound. New York: North Point Press.

Blair, Kristine, Radhika Gajjala, and Christine Tulley. 2009. “Introduction - The Webs We Weave: Locating the Feminism in Cyberfeminism.” In Webbing Cyberfeminist Practice: Communities, Pedagogies, and Social Action, edited by Kristine Blair, Radkhika Gajjala, and Christine Tulley. 1-19. Creskill: Hampton Press.

Everyday Feminism. “About Everyday Feminism.” Accessed March 30, 2016. http://everydayfeminism.com/about-ef/

Everyday Feminism.”Comments Policy.” Accessed March 30, 2016. http://everydayfeminism.com/about-ef/comments-policy/

Everyday Feminism. “Facebook Page.” Accessed March 30, 2016. https://www.facebook.com/everydayfeminism

Gerlitz, Carolin, and Anne Helmond. 2011. “The Like Economy: The Social Web in Transition.” Paper presented at MiT7 - Unstable Platforms: The Promise and Peril of Transition, MIT, Boston, MA: http://web.mit.edu/comm-forum/mit7/papers/MiT7%20Gerlitz%20%20%20%20%20%20Helmond%20-%20The%20Like%20economy.pdf.

McGerty, Lisa-Jane. 2000. “‘Nobody Lives Only in Cyberspace’: Gendered Subjectivities and Domestic Uses of the Internet.” CyberPsychology & Behaviour 3: 895-99.

Probyn, Ellspeth. 2000. “Shaming Theory, thinking dis-connections: Feminism and Reconciliation.” In Transformations: Thinking Through Feminism, edited by Sara Ahmed, Jane Kilby, Celia Lury, Maureen McNeil, and Beverley Skeggs. 48-60. New York: Routledge Press.

Queen, Mary. 2009. “Consuming the Stranger: Technologies of Rhetorical Action in Transnational Feminist Encounter.” In Webbing Cyberfeminist Practice: Communities, Pedagogies, and Social Action, edited by Kristine Blair, Radkhika Gajjala, and Christine Tulley. 263-86. Creskill: Hampton Press.

Ridolfo, Jim, and Dà nielle Nicole DeVoss. 2009. “Composing for Recomposition: Rhetorical Velocity and Delivery.” Kairos: A Journal of Rhetoric, Technology, and Pedagogy 13.2: http://kairos.technorhetoric.net/13.2/topoi/ridolfo_devoss/index.html.

Royster, Jacqueline Jones, and Gesa E. Kirsch. 2012. Feminist Rhetorical Practices: New Horizons for Rhetoric, Composition, and Literacy Studies. Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press.

Ziarek Plonowska, Ewa. 2001. The Ethics of Dissensus: PostModernity, Feminism, and the Politics of Radical Democracy. Stanford: Stanford University Press.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.17380/rr2016.2.1

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.